Talk:History of the Daleks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Return of the Daleks
Moved from the article: [This Emperor] — evidently not Davros — Why? If the person who wrote that meant that the 2005 Emperor doesn't look the way Davros did when we last saw him, why not say that explicitly? Better still, why not let the pictures do the talking? Dan 00:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Depending on whether you count Big Finish's Terror Firma as canon - where Davros mutates into an actual Dalek and becomes the Dalek Emperor - it could very well be Davros, albeit a hugely-changed Davros. - SoM 02:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I have added a section on the genesis arc, based on what I could tell from the trailor. Some of it is slightly conjectural, so it may need editing.--Warlorddagaz 18:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- I removed it because most of it pretty much is speculative. Let's wait for the episode proper. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Short history of the Daleks
Why is there a need for a fork article? The summary is already in the main Dalek article under "History". --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 17:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I only did it because if I simply removed the summary from Dalek, you'd complain. So I put it somewhere out of the way.--Keycard (talk) 07:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- If length is an issue, discuss how to cut it down, rather than slice it out entirely. Forking the article is unnecessary and causes more problems than it solves. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 09:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)