Talk:History of Louisville, Kentucky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Skip to Table of Contents Skip to Table of Contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Louisville, Kentucky article.

Good articles History of Louisville, Kentucky has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
Citation
This page was cited by LouisvilleKY.gov
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Louisville, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Louisville on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
Wikipedians in Louisville may be able to help!
To-do list for History of Louisville, Kentucky: edit · history · watch · refresh
19th century
  • Cover effects of New Madrid earthquake.
  • Expand coverage of the pre-Civil War slave trade in Louisville.
20th century
General
  • Take to Featured Article status.
  • Cover historical snow storms
  • In a comprehensive way, convey Louisville's centrality to three transportation industries as they emerged: inland waterway transport, railroads and automobiles.
  • Cover the flourishing of the performing arts in Louisville (summarize here, and put full history in Performing arts in Louisville, Kentucky).

Contents

[edit] Explanation of new sections

I've set up the article into sections by century. I'm not sure if this is the best idea really, consider History of New York City, History of Boston, History of Miami - every one has a different scheme going (and the last one is a FA). But for now let's see how it goes. I am thinking there will be 3 subsections to each section except the earliest, the 19th century will eventually have a subsection for Louisville during the Civil War, I think. But since that isn't written yet, I am not sure how much space it will need. Anyway, that's where I'm going with all of this... --W.marsh 17:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

This construct looks pretty good to me. We can always make adjustments later if needed. By the way, I am working with a Civil War author to create a Creative Commons article re: Louisville during the Civil War on his website, and a subsection and article here can be built from that. —  Stevie is the man!  Talk | Work 18:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Resource

Just found this: [1]. It's a (I think) fully online book about Louisville during WW2. I don't have time to read it right now, but I thought I'd mention it here... seems like a good resource. --W.marsh 00:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Selected article for Portal:History

After investigation and asking questions, it looks like there would be nothing impeding us from making this article the next Selected article at Portal:History. Since the portal isn't being run very tightly right now, we could possibly end up with our article on the page for more than the standard one-month period. If anyone would like to help write a "blurb" for this article to use on the page, please add your proposal for the blurb to this section. I will probably give it a try myself shortly, but if others want to beat me to it, that's fine and dandy. Thanks. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 01:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antebellum

The following clause doesn't make sense to me: "However, most cargo was still sending much more cargo downstream in the early 19th century...". Is there a word askew in there somewhere? By the way, thanks W.marsh for all the new content. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 18:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll fix it. I've finally gotten some energy to work on this article... hoping to get through the 19th century today... using Yater's book as a reference. I'm a bit worried about over-citation of it, though it is the definitive work to be citing. --W.marsh 18:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)