Historiometry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Francis Galton, one of the pioneers of historiometry.
Enlarge
Francis Galton, one of the pioneers of historiometry.

Historiometry is the historical study of human progress or individual personal characteristics, using statistics to analyze references to famous people, their statements, behavior and discoveries in relatively neutral texts. Historiometry combines techniques from cliometrics, which studies the history of economics and from psychometrics, the psychological study of an individual's personality and abilities.

Contents

[edit] Origins

Historiometry started in the early 19th century with studies on the relationship between age and achievement by Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet in the careers of prominent French and English playwrights [1][2] but it was Sir Francis Galton, a pioneering English eugenist who popularized historiometry in his 1869 work, Hereditary Genius. [3] It was further developed by Frederick Adams Woods (who coined the term historiometry[4][5]) in the beginning of the 20th century [6]. Also psychologist Paul E. Meehl published several papers on historiometry later in his career, mainly in the area of medical history, although it is usually referred to as cliometric metatheory by him [7][8].

[edit] Current research

Prominent current historiometry researchers include Dean Keith Simonton and Charles Murray.

Historiometry is defined by Dean Keith Simonton as: a quantitative method of statistical analysis for retrospective data. In Simonton's work the raw data comes from psychometric assessment of famous personalities, often already deceased, in an attempt to assess creativity, genius and talent development. [9]

Charles Murray's Human Accomplishment is the most extensive compilation of this approach to quantify the impact of individuals on technology, science and the arts. It tracks the most important achievements across time, and for the different peoples of the world, and provides a thorough discussion of the methodology used, together with an assessment of its reliability and accuracy. [10]

[edit] Examples of research

Since histiometry deals with subjective personal traits as creativity, charisma or openness most studies deal with the comparison of scientists, artists or politicians. The famous study (Human Accomplishment) by Charles Murray classifies, for example, Einstein and Newton as the most important physicists and Michelangelo as the top ranking western artist. As another example, several studies have compared charisma and even the IQ of presidents and presidential candidates of the United States of America [11][12]. The latter study classifies John Quincy Adams as the cleverest US president, with an estimated IQ between 165 to 175 [13].

[edit] Critique

Since historiometry is based on indirect information like historic documents and relies heavily on statistics, the results of these studies are questioned by some researchers, mainly because of concerns about overinterpretation of the estimated results [14][15].

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Eakin, Emily. "A Cultural Scorecard Says West Is Ahead", New York Times, 2003-10-25, p. 9. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  2. ^ Neiwert, David (2003-10-26). Evading reality (blog). Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  3. ^ Galton, Francis [1869]. Hereditary Genius. London: MacMillan & Co. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  4. ^ Simonton, Dean Keith (2003). "Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data". Annua. Rev. Psychol. 54: 617–640. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145034. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  5. ^ Woods, Frederick Adams (1909). "A new name for a new science". Science 30: 697-736. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  6. ^ Woods, Frederick Adams (1911). "Historiometry as an exact science". Science 33: 568-574. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  7. ^ Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (2002). "Using meta-scientific studies to clarify or resolve questions in the philosophy and history of science.". Philosophy of Science 69: S185-S196. DOI:10.1086/341845. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  8. ^ Meehl, P. E. (1992). "Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science.". Psychological Reports 71: 339-467.
  9. ^ Simonton, Dean Keith [1999]. Genius Creativity and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries. iUniverse.com. ISBN 1583484388.
  10. ^ Murray, Charles [2003]. Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences 800 B.C to 1950. HarperCollins. ISBN 006019247X.
  11. ^ Deluga, R.J. (1997). "Relationship among American presidential charismatic leadership, narcissism, and rated performance.". Leadership Quarterly 8: 49-65. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90030-8. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  12. ^ Dean Keith Simonton (August 2006). "Presidential IQ, Openness, Intellectual Brilliance, and Leadership: Estimates and Correlations for 42 U.S. Chief Executives". Political Psychology 27: 511-526. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00524.x. Retrieved on 2006-09-11.
  13. ^ Dobson, Roger (2006-09-10). Bush IQ low on presidential league. Times Online. Retrieved on 2006-09-10.
  14. ^ Bastick, Tony (1999). Historiometrics of Creativity: A Philosophical Critique.. Education Resources Information Center. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
  15. ^ Mackenzie, B. (1986). "Genius, creativity, and leadership. Historiometric inquiries.". Med Hist. 30: 109–110. Retrieved on 2006-09-13.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../h/i/s/Historiometry.html"