User talk:Herbythyme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Baring-Gould

It's just that it's an article about Sabine Baring-Gould, not an article about Pygmalion. You make a good point that Baring-Gould is obviously can't be the only inspiration for the play, and I did change the wording of the section to reflect it. But if people are curious about further sources for Pygmalion, they should follow the link to that article.

I came to the article because I was working on another article about a short story called "The Rats in the Walls", which is thought to have been inspired in part by Baring-Gould's Curious Myths. It's not the only work that's been cited as an inspiration, but I don't see any point in mentioning those other works in Baring-Gould's article. Do you?

It's true that the claim about Pygmalion is not well-sourced. I assume it's from the Warwick School history that is cited in the references. Nareek 23:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Herbythyme! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 15:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

[edit] Little much

You are most welcome. Happy editing! Kukini 18:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] River Ashburn

I think you will find there are no notability criteria established for geographical features. So your suggestion that this article to be deleted due to the size of the river is unlikely to be accepted. Best Wishes Saga City 14:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

As a point of interest did you check just how many "rivers" have pretty much the same text and are stubs in the area? The editor didn't managed to get the categories right either. --Herby ^{talk to me} 15:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

But this is exactly what stubs are for. They are like seeds; some grow, some die and others wither away. The comment about categories is not part of this argument unless you are implying that this is evidence that the contributor is failing in some way. Saga City 20:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The river in question

How wide and how long are we talking? I tend to be a bit of an inclusionist on rivers and other bodies of water. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 14:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

PS---try not to call other people's takes on Wikipedia "silly." I did not take offense and I know that you meant none, but some people do tend to get a bit hot under the collar and would be offended. Its just a good rule of thumb to ensure that you can work on articles undustracted by those that tend to get huffy (you can scroll through my talk page archives for examples). Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 14:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, based on your description, I might be inclined to agree with you. It might not be a bad idea to go ahead and AfD it to let the lot of us Wikipedians sort it out. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I know you weren't. I was just giving you a heads up. There are some hot heads lurking about here. :) youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Be Bold! dammit :) youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] By the way...

Check out your userpage, you've received an award. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks..

...for noticing the northallerton request and edit. It's nice to get some feedback :). btw where did that great big Welcome pack above come from? I want one of them!--Rob2000 15:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Yorkshire thing (and I don't mean the pudding)

My guess is that it would survive an AfD (AfD is generally not considered to be the best solution for crap articles written on ok topics), do it seeming to be somewhat worthy of inclusion on some level. However, the pov in the article is, well, um, pov. My suggestion would be to work on removing the pov language yourself, It'll be good practice for you, as every experienced Wikipedian has had to salvage an article like this in the past in the name of the greater good, altruism, no one else is going to bother, etc.

If the author gives you any "I appreciate your work, but I work for them and I know how it should be" crap, try to explain to them the 'pedia's policy on POV and adverts. Be constructive and friendly, but firm. Anyways, good luck and don't be afraid to ask any more questions in the future. We are all in this together. Cheers. youngamerican (yo) 11:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lustleigh Edits

Thanks for your feedback on the Lustleigh edits. Sorry if it sounded harsh. i have read the style guide, and i agree that historically, the article may have contained a fair amount of POV writing. That said, i think your axe was a little heavy handed and you left the article in a state which meant it didn't make a lot of sense. Looking up a village and finding a considerable treatise on Church bells isn't necesarily logical. I also thought it was a little strange to cut out references to village amenities - in context with the UK trend for not having this amenities, the presence of them is therefore unusual, and worthy of inclusion.

I agree with tidying up the article from a POV style. As far as histroy goes, as soon as get round to adding history of the village, i'll put that before "The Village Now", but the church bells should definately be further down the Wiki - and could even deserve their own Wiki page - what do you think?

That all said, some good imput and tidying there, but maybe a smaller pair of pruning shears, rather than a large axe? Regards, owain.davies —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Owain.davies (talk • contribs) 13:38, 17 Oct 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ten Tors

In responce to your comment:

"OK - so why did you remove that piece. I stress I don't disagree with you and almost took it out myself (!) but it would interest me and genuinely - welcome. -"

I removed this as I thought it could be better worded. Ill leave it upto the 'regulars' on this site to make it better.

Im sorry but Im very new, and know very little about using this site. Ten Tors 07! Here We Come! 12:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BudeauxBoy (talk • contribs) 12:16, 27 Oct 2006 (UTC)

[edit] pic

Hi, this shot was made by 4wd, not me :-) --Ü 22:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lustleigh

Thanks for your nice comment on my Talk Page concerning my heavy editing on the article. I puzzle over why contributors write in such an unencyclopedic way. My guess is that they don't read other relevant articles to see the Wikipedia style. Thanks again - Adrian Pingstone 18:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks!

— Saxifrage

[edit] wikEd

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your input!

Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|^talk|_books 13:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AWB

Hi Herby,

You're better asking whiteknight, I don't know what AWB is, and can't use it because I use a macintosh. If you have access to IRC, darklama is almost always on freenode #wikibooks (the man never sleeps!), and he'll definitely understand the issue better than I. --SB_Johnny|^talk|_books 17:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] north york moors

you have changed the link to Let's Stay North York Moors to the official moors website.

this is the incorrect link,

lets stay north york moors is an independant website not linked to the offical moors website.

it is the only dedicated north york moors website.

ive changed it back

thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.43.21.229 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 27 Nov 2006 (UTC)