Talk:Here Come the Warm Jets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Nick Kool & the Koolaids
Am I right in thinking that Nick Kool & the Koolaids, credited with keyboards, were actually NME journalist Nick Kent?
BTLizard 14:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] (No Pussyfooting)
I don't want to get into a edit war over this but the title of this recording is (No Pussyfooting) . Fripp & Eno are the artists. Calling it Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting) is like calling the second Beatles album The Beatles With The Beatles.
BTLizard 18:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- There is no need to get into an edit war, because I am correct and you are wrong :-D In all seriousness: the title is "Fripp & Eno (no pussyfooting)". This is a little play on words, meaning "Fripp and Eno (no mucking about wasting time)", referring to their spontaneous working methods. It is probably best said in a Cockney accent ;-) If you take off the "Fripp & Eno" bit, then there is no reason for the brackets to be there - you've broken the pun. To use your example, it would be like saying the Beatles record's title was "With", by The Beatles. Clearing this would be ludicrous: the title of that album is "With the Beatles" - it is a little phrase in itself, which doesn't work unless "The Beatles" is in it - remove it and you just get "With". You see? --feline1 18:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
PS No pussyfooting isn't an "Eno" album *anyways*, so it doesn't belong in the Infobox chronology - it's a Fripp & Eno album.--feline1 18:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Baby's on Fire solo?
I just reverted this change about the guitar solo in Baby's on Fire: Contrary to popular belief, it was done by Paul Rudolph, not Robert Fripp. I've never heard such a thing before, but googling around I see that other people have made the same suggestion. I can't find a good source for it, however. Can anyone provide a solid source one way or the other (not counting blogs, forums, etc!)? If so, please revert my reversion. thanks. bikeable (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] YouTube
YouTube
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- If that's true, i shall remove it. That's a shame though. Andrzejbanas 18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)