Talk:Henry Hudson Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To view PHOTOS of the bridge, go to: http://thebassguy.com/henryhudsonbridge

these pics are cool and artistic and all, (Some are VERY pretty, it is a pretty bridge) but this is apparently a commercial site, so I'd say this link is fine here but not a good link for the main article? ++Lar: t/c 22:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I think the photos are great, lots of different perspectives of the bridge. I don't the the commercial status of the site makes it reason for excluding (structurae & google maps are for profit also). It would make a good addition. Cacophony 22:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
You're right! Added. ++Lar: t/c 23:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] main article?

I don't see how Transportation in New York City is the main article for Henry Hudson Bridge. The main article for Henry Hudson Bridge is Henry Hudson Bridge. If Henry Hudson Bridge should be in a transportation in NYC category or something, then it would be more appropriate to add it to the category. It is inappropriate to start the article about a particular bridge with a link to a transportation article. Maybe a see also seciton or something. Just not at the top of the article. Cacophony 22:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Not opposed to a see also section reference but it's not a main IMHO. This was an anonymous edit IIRC. ++Lar: t/c 22:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maint

Not to count how many angels dance on the head of a pin but should the maint field in the box say TBTA or MTA or both? TBTA is a sub of the other one. Giving the name of one and linking to the other may be confusing. Maybe not the most earth shattering distinction... ++Lar: t/c 13:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)