Talk:Henry Blodget

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

In what capacity does he "still work in the industry"? Is that meant to imply that he's violating the terms of his settlement? In what way? Mjs 14:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't think it is fair to say that Blodget is a "journalist." He is a Wall Street crook with a column. I am removing him from that category.--Mantanmoreland 22:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Crooks can be journalists!John wesley

True, but not everyone who writes for magazines is a journalist. Including crooks! I can see Jim Cramer in the journalist category because he has been writing for years and has written several books. But this person is different. Anyway, if the consensus is to keep him in that category I won't object of course, but I think the issue needs to be given some thought. --Mantanmoreland 22:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Incidentally -- separate from this -- I see that there is a "fraudster" category. Question is, not having been convicted, would he belong there?--Mantanmoreland 13:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)