User talk:Hellznrg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed your comment from Talk:Muhammad Drawings as talk of bombing Mecca, even as a "joke" is a breach of Wikipedia's Civility policy. Secretlondon 10:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Dear Hellznrg: what comment did you make regarding the bombing of Mecca? How come I can't find it anywhere in the talkpage history for the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons article? L33th4x0r 01:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

This user contributes using Mozilla Firefox.

129.97.252.63 18:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Who am I?

Dear Hellznrg:

Go here : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Qatarson&oldid=37767555

and you can judge for yourself whether I am a "Muhammaden". :-)

Regards,

L33th4x0r 02:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] L33th4x0r

Yo Hellznrg:

Yeah, your talk is really funny. And I think that's a potential problem with all religions -- we are not sure if the entity we believe in is real or not.

And this is even a problem with Buddhism -- could it be guaranteed that by following the teachings of Buddhism I will forever be out of the reincarnation cycle? But Buddhism says when you ask this question you're destined to hell in your next life. So there.

I think the biggest problem I have with the religion of the MoMo (short for Mohammed-Mohammed) is its suppression of women. Like what one of the cartoon said, "Prophet: daft and dumb, keeping woman under thumb". I find it very perplexing that a religion requiring head to toe veiling of women and condones wife-beating could claim that it's protecting women's dignity.

That's my two cents on everything. I fear of saying more at the repercussion of the Jihad-Wikipedians.

Peace out,

L33th4x0r 23:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re talk:space elevator

re: [1] I notice you display your emotional age as "a child" in your user page. It's nice that you admit it, but perhaps you should consider aspiring to something better. Just a thought. KarlBunker 14:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Not good.[2]. Midgley 18:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cease uncivil behaivior and false accusations

I posted this in the talk page of 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict

"Hellznrg accused me of "stealth vandalism" for reverting to its more or less original, consensus form the intro paragraph of the article. I stated the reasons for the edit both here in talk and in the comments of the edit. I ask user Hellznrg to retract and apologize for his uncivil behaivior, and to pleas ein the future read and discuss in the talk pages before doing such a major, and controversial, edit.--Cerejota 22:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)"

Perhaps you should be aware I earned a barnstar for my quality edits in that page (from someone int he Israeli side of the POV) and that if anything, am too open and honest as to my motives and editing (I comment most of my stuff in talk, for example). Perhaps since you don't know me you assumed that my edit was a "stealt vandalism", but please refrain from this in the future. If you wish to raise any further issues regarding the page, feel free to use its talk page. Thanks, --Cerejota 22:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please cease uncivil behaivior towards me, again

You posted:

I have seen cerejota (pro-islamist) do the same with the article summmary. Where it once mentioned that "samir kuntar" was in prison for killing a 4-yo child after killing her father, cerejota removed it and relegated it to some dark corner of wikipedia to prevent that little known fact from seeing the light of day Shakespeare Monkey 08:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I ask you to please apologize for describing me as "pro-islamist".

I am not such a thing.

Since this bears clarification, I will soapboax: I am agnostic, from a catholic background, and view all religion with interested detachment. Furthermore, I have an utter contempt for all attempts to join politics with religion, but also a keen understanding that when religion is part of a national or ethnic identity, this contempt must be tempered.

In my personal opinion, Israel as it exists today is the same as Iran as it exists today: Parlamentary theocracy, based upon the imposition of a State Religion, and with clear violation of the human rights of all of those who don't follow the State religion. The council of mullahs vs the council of rabbis.

I view Islamism and Zionism as exactly the same thing, and a salient fact of this conflict is the utter contempt that both Zionists and Islamists have for civilian lives, including that of their co-religionists. The facts support this assertion.

That is not to say I belive in a plague to both houses: Israel has demonstrated since the day it was founded to be a militaristic society based around a constant need to make war with its neighbors, and in fact has batustanized the native arab and palestinian population (and to a lesser and more complex extent the Druze). The treatment of the Palestinians stands as clear, unavoidable example, however the facts of the matter are tried to be twisted.

I dream of a day when the State of Israel is susbtitued with a Palestine with jews, christians, muslism and druze living in peace, in a secular, democratic state, with separation of religion and state. I dream of a day when the same exists whenever theocracy rears it ugly head, like in Iran, Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent, the USA. My political beliefs, hence stand in complete opposition of both Hezbollah and the Israeli state, and closer to that of the Israeli refuseniks and the Arab secularists.

So no, I am not a pro-islamist, and I feel offended for your decription of me as one, and ask you to apologize. In any case, I am pro-humanity.

Of course, I have many times been attacked as pro-Israeli, and I take the same offense.--Cerejota 01:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

This is the second time you approach me uncivily, and you haven't apologized for the first one. I will reply to the content of you assertion in the talk page of the article. Thanks. --Cerejota 01:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Children's English Wikipedia

There is currently a request for a Children's English Wikipedia at meta. The difference between the English Wikipedia and the proposed one is that this wiki is quite complicated and talks a lot about boring stuff. You can vote and find out more about the request at the request page.

You have got this message because you are categorized as a child Wikipedian. If you have been categorized incorrectly, I suggest that you remove the code that does that and I appologize for any inconvenience caused. --Leon2323 21:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: Artificial artificial intelligence