Talk:Heinkel He 112
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Heinkel He 112 is part of WikiProject Aircraft, an attempt to better organize articles related to aircraft. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
|
|
[edit] Detail level
There seems to be too much detail in this article.GraemeLeggett 12:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I feel like this article should look more like Heinkel He 111 in terms of material and detail level. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Disagree. Too much detail? Not (practically) possible IMHO. - Aerobird 01:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- This article reads more like someone's research paper than it does an encyclopedia article. Fitting since it is apparently based upon this. Right now this article is 57k in text. The Messerschmitt Bf 109, a plane that used far more and is quite well known is only 38k. While I understand that this may not be a fair comparison, I still hope this fact serves to show that this article is too bloated. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- IMHO, that proves the Bf 109 article is too short. ;-) But I understand your point. - Aerobird 02:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- This article reads more like someone's research paper than it does an encyclopedia article. Fitting since it is apparently based upon this. Right now this article is 57k in text. The Messerschmitt Bf 109, a plane that used far more and is quite well known is only 38k. While I understand that this may not be a fair comparison, I still hope this fact serves to show that this article is too bloated. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RLM Contest
Since the RLM contest text seems to be largely common to all the aircraft involved, wouldn't it be better hived off to a separate article and a summary left in each planes article? GraemeLeggett 15:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, there is a lot of material here and backstory, which although interesting, doesn't need to be repeated over and over. I think it should be broken off into its own article and linked it back to here. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Conclusions
This section is not original research. It is taken from the document referenced in the "Source" section at the bottom of the page. - Aerobird 16:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
