User talk:Hazelfo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Blah blah blah.

So I neglect to upload an image tag once in a while... No need to make a whole page about it.

[edit] Over the top. DELETE. DELETE. DELETE.

My god. How many usertags do you NEED?! --Robbie 07:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so they're called userboxes. I'm an idiot.

[edit] Sam!!

Oh I hate Sam, she is a big bitch, I wanna poke her in the eye... and something. I forgot the words. Someday I shall upload the MP3 of Hazel singing. It's really quite beautiful. --Robbie 05:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

It is done. --Robbie 06:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Doc Hammer

  • Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy on self-references. Your changes have been reverted. Danny Lilithborne 06:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Danny Lilithborne 06:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
      • God I love life. --Hazelfo
        • You're uncooperation with Wikipedia users to improve the quality of Wikipedai is not appreaciated and the AMA and various users have been informed.-Diabolos 07:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
          • Fine with me. "Uncooperation" is not a word. Maybe you should try correct yourself before you correct my Wikipedia habits. --Hazelfo

[edit] Vandalizing your own page

Sorry about that. These things can get confusing with all the editors around. --Chodorkovskiy (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I understand, but jeez, reverting edits on userpages? Don't you have better pages to babysit? --Hazelfo

[edit] AMA Inquiry

Hello, Hazelflo, I'm Steve Caruso and I am acting as Diabolos' Advocate. Diabolos has requested my assistance to articulate her concerns about the recent bit of friction that has come up over the Doc Hammer article. Seeing what I've looked up in the article's history, what you've placed on your userpage, as well as what she has been discussing with me, I would like to inquire into the motivations behind your actions as I personally am having difficulty understanding the choices you've made. Most editors here at Wikipedia would consider such acts as personal attacks, incivility, edit warring and vandalism, things that strain against the core principles of the encyclopedia. As such, I would truly appreciate it if you could explain to me "your side" of the situation so that I can better understand everything that is going on. Thanks! אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA/vote for me) 00:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

It's simple. I don't consider what I have done as any of those things. I think Diabolos was just annoyed because Doc Hammer's page didn't follow her "rules" of what a Wikipedia page should look like. (I.E., no trivia section, no personality, no touch of fun.) Then she got her friends to agree with her and try again and again to delete sections I've worked very hard on (and I'm the only person who has.) Then she blames me for vandalizing her userpage, which I have never done. And I really do not consider what I have written in her user talk page as a "personal attack," mostly because it was an observational statement about how she got so stressed out over a page she never cared about until there was something for her to complain about. And my name is HAZELFO. --Hazelfo 00:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I apologize for inadvertently messing up your name. I've made a copy of our current thread of discussion over at User:The_Thadman/Advocacy_Requests#Diabolos_.28talk.7Ccontribs.29 (which I see that you've come across). I'd appreciate it if we could continue this there. :-) Peace, אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA/vote for me) 02:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of obese cartoon characters

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of obese cartoon characters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:List of obese cartoon characters. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr Stephen 19:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Why are you telling me this? I didn't make the article. --Hazelfo 19:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Politeness. You made about a dozen edits to the article, so I assumed you would be interested. Regards, Mr Stephen 19:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Personally I think the article is on par with list of fictional ducks. Maybe even the list of contemporary guqin players. --Hazelfo 19:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
We must distinguish between (i) what is stated in reliable third-party resources (ii) opinion, and (iii) original research. If Jerry Beck says writes in a book that Bluto is obese, then we can report it (properly referenced); if I think Bluto is obese, that is POV and cannot be used on WP; if I find his height and weight and calculate he's obese, then that is original research, and cannot be used on WP. I've taken it to AfD, see the following boilerplate. Your contributions are welcome. Regards, Mr Stephen 19:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Nomination: List of obese cartoon characters

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that List of obese cartoon characters meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of obese cartoon characters. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Mr Stephen 19:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar EATEN BY A BEAR

I think you put this on your User Page. Oh, well. But basically your summary made my day.

The Barnstar EATEN BY A BEAR
I, --Diabolos 02:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC), hereby award Hazelfo the The Barnstar EATEN BY A BEAR for summarizing this edit[1] with It would look weird to say he was divorced from a lady it never said he married.
Thanks!--Hazelfo 03:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:1007042437 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1007042437 l.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Urbaniak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Urbaniak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

[edit] Image:The Nose that Knows by Doc Hammer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Nose that Knows by Doc Hammer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 16:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC) This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../h/a/z/User_talk%7EHazelfo_77f0.html"