Talk:Havok (software)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Rename
It was suggested that this article should be renamed Havok. The vote is shown below:
- I disagree. The Havok page already has information on the comic book character. The two topics are quite unrelated, so a merge would not work. No, I think it would be best if this page stays at Havok (software). — EagleOne\Talk 16:47, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- I Disagree, havok does not exclusively refer to that software nor is it the most common usage.Gateman1997 00:37, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- I also disagree. Not most common usage. —Lowellian (reply) 18:47, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's not the primary usage. K1Bond007 05:49, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. violet/riga (t) 13:43, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Havok on 360?
Perfect Dark Zero uses Havok right? It's listed. But Xbox 360 isn't listed as Havok compatible.--128.146.68.89 03:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Halo 2
According to X-Play Bungee invented their own physics engine, so why is it on the list of games that use Havok? Playwrite 14:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- According to Bungie, they did invent their own the first time around, only to want for more physics interaction, and went with Havok. Bungie : Top Story Mhoskins 23:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Halo 3
I dont think bungie said anything about Halo 3's pysics engine. should it be removed, it is speculation.68.190.230.156 05:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Version Differences
Please add any known sources or information that describe the differences between the major versions of Havok. Thank you. 71.129.204.122 00:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] pandemic studios and gears of war?
is this the engine being used in Gears of War?
No, and Epic developed Gears of War Siofra
[edit] comparison with other engines?
how does this compare with the Unreal Engine(s), past and present?
[edit] Long list of supported games moved
The L-O-N-G list of supported games was getting longer than the actual article - and kinda pointless. I moved the content over to List of games using physics engines - but to be honest, that list is also kinda pointless. If you want to continue adding to it - feel free. SteveBaker 14:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion
I'm putting this article up for speedy deletion, since it fulfills the requirements set out in Wikipedia:Spam#Advertisements masquerading as articles. For example, it uses "we", which clearly indicates the content was written by the company. Benandorsqueaks 21:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind, I realized I should just revert to previous edit. I should have checked that first. Benandorsqueaks 22:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
