Talk:Hard-core predicate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There's a new paper The security of all RSA and discrete log bits whose abstract states that:
- all bits of RSA and discrete log are hard core
- every block of log |x| bits is simultaneously hard core
which is very relevant and very exciting; I haven't read the paper yet; the article needs to be updated. Arvindn 07:35, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Yep, this has actually been known for awhile, it's just now appearing in journal form. I can try to take a crack at some point in the near future. --Chris Peikert 20:36, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This question concerns blackbox one-way functions and computable one-way functions. [I use slightly different notation - g is used to indicate the hard-core predicate instead of B]
Let be a length-preserving one-way function, and
Let be the hardcore predicate of f.
Due to the Goldreich-Levin theorem, such a hardcore predicate exists for all length-preserving one-way functions.
We define the probabilities
and
Here: f(.) represents the algorithm for computing} f
B(f(.)) represents a blackbox for computing f
x is a finite length string chosen uniformly from {0,1} * , and
A is any PPT algorithm.
The Goldreich-Levin theorem says that if f is one-way, then for all algorithms A, the probability u is negligible function of | x | . Thus, v is also a negligible function of | x | .
However, the Goldreich-Levin theorem does not say anything about the ratio k = v / u.
My question: Is k a negligible function of | x | too? According to my logic, k should be close to 1, and should be independent of x.
Observation: If k = 1 then having access to the algorithm of f does not give any additional advantage over having blackbox access to f (in computing the hard-core predicate)