Talk:Harald Naegeli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information

An entry from Harald Naegeli appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 24 February 2006.

nice idea, Lupo :) I might try to get a GFDL snapshot of Undine. According to de: however, he was not arrested in Lörrach but on entering Denmark. dab (ᛏ) 11:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Hm. That's right. The German police arrested him at the border to Denmark, but he was handed over to the Swiss police at Lörrach. I don't really have the time right now, but I've found a couple of good sources and will expand that 1970s/80s part tonight. And yes, a photograph would be most appreciated. I've found two on the web (one from before the restoration), but since I know you're in Zürich and could easily take such a picture, I can't really claim "fair use" on them. Side note: according to the Swiss copyright law, §27, "works at or on publically accessible places or ground may be pictured, and the picture may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise distributed. The picture must not be three-dimensional, and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original." Hence the only copyright on such an image that we'd have to worry about would be the photographer's. Lupo 12:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)