User talk:Halloween jack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Halloween jack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}

[edit] Reasons DC's Captain Nazi did not die

I saw your contribution on the Captain Nazi discussion page and wanted to show you why Captain Nazi might still be alive.

• 1) Jason Todd did not cut Cap Nazi's head off, eat his brain, burn his corpse and mix it with dog food and feed it to pit-bulls. Therefor, logically, we must conclude that the writers intend for him to still be alive.

• 2) He may actually have been faking his death by using a new power never before described, the ability to grow a new head.

• 3) He could be restored to life by magic.

• 4) Alexander Luthor also have anticipated his demise and removed CN's real head and placed it in cryogenic freaze. Then had drunken fraternity kid's controlling the body of CN throughout the fight by remote control. This would explain his poor fighting skills.

• 5) Provided that his body still exists, the genetic material could be used to clone him and his memories may have been backed up in the Society's computer.

• 6) Captain Nazi may be too lame to get into hell.

[edit] Kimagure Orange Road

Thank you for your recent correction on this article. Please note, however, that it's recommended and strongly encouraged to be polite when editing. Comments such as, "We round-eyes call it "English," moron." do not help in the creation of a cooperative and pleasant atmosphere here on Wikipedia. Thank you for refraining from such comments in the future.

Again, thank you for your contribution. (^_^) --nihon 01:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rightroundhouse.gif

Thank you for editing roundhouse kick and adding an image. However, the specific image is subject to copyright, the permissions granted on its original page (there are none) are not sufficient for compatibility with the GFDL and, in my opinion, the image’s use to illustrate a roundhouse kick does not qualify as fair use (the image is used neither as a logo nor in the context of critical commentary). Are you the copyright owner or do you have the owner’s permission to place the image here? Then please make this and the terms of use clear on its description page. Otherwise, please try to obtain the owner’s permission to use the image and, failing that, please nominate it for deletion. —xyzzy_n 04:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Rightroundhouse.gif

—xyzzy_n 13:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Seagal

Good work on that page. It needs a reasonable hand. I almost gave up on it.Peter Rehse 00:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Seagal page

madd propz, homie. damn peeps be all up on that page causin trouble. represent. --Ghetteaux 22:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Seagal page

Y do u keep removing true trivia from seagal? I own 4 biographies of him and everything that was added is true --Ghetteaux 14:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

yo, 86.16.102.3, if u r going 2 impersonate me, at least do me some justice, homie. cheque tha history for the REEL Ghetteaux comments. piece. --Ghetteaux 19:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lady Shiva

Waaaaay back in December 2005, you put on Lady Shiva's page, regarding The Question "They have encountered each other from time to time since then, and almost every time Shiva tests his skills against her own. Sage has become a measuring stick for Shiva and she has been heard to comment that his skills are among the best in the world." I was wondering if you could cite your source for that. To the best of my knowledge they've never met outside of O'Neil's "The Question" series, where she "tested" his new skills once and beat him so easily that she was sad at how much of Richard Dragon's teachings he had forgotten. I don't know of any time she described his skills as being among the best in the world, but perhaps I missed something.D1Puck1T 21:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

No. I didn't make that edit. You should check the history page more closely, find out who made the edit, and ask them.--Halloween jack 23:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Dang. Sorry, thought I'd traced it back. The guy that actually added it also deleted ALL the formatting (wikilinks, sections, superherobox, etc). You restored everything but added his text. I just assumed he hadn't added anything. My bad.D1Puck1T 02:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nemi (the comic)

I was going to wait a while before removing that stuff about the Metro translations, but thanks! 172.214.217.16 19:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.90.248.44 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HWA RANG DO page information

Why remove Hwa Rang Do subsection comments which I added my account was factual and relevant to the controversy section. i am actually under a master who was under Joo Bang Lee, etc. it's sad that correct information would be removed. or, in general, that information would be removed unnecessarily instead of perhaps reformatted or edited instead of obliterated. There are people who trained with Joo Bang Lee and claim he got instruction from IN SUN SEO (hapkido grandmaster), etc. It was cited as 'rumor and controversy' for veracity, etc. i realize that the tangent into Mr. Echanis might SEEM extraordinary, but I do think it's highly relevant to the credibility of the system (right now some of the secret service knife self-defense moves are based entirely on what Mr. Echanis learned with HWARANGDO, etc).

• What you think you know is completely irrelevant. What you can prove is relevant. All of what you posted on the page is, in addition to being written and formatted improperly, just rumour or opinion that can't be verified. I'm not saying that you're lying, but I don't have any proof that it's true, either, and because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, you have to provide sources and references for things you put in an article. Also, trying to make a case for yourself by telling us who you studied under, what ranks you hold, etc. is completely useless; I have no way of knowing whether or not any of that is true. Is the information you placed in the article "factual and relevant?" Then provide a source for it. --Halloween jack 22:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recent edit to groin attack article

Hello, dear sir.

In your recent revert to the Groin attack article, you commented that:

"Well-documented by Internet forums" is kinda like saying "Affirmed by nice people such as Adolf Hitler"

Would you care to elaborate on this comparison?

I'm not going to bother editing this back, but I would urge you to revert your own revert. I obviously can't cite personal experience, since that would be original research, but if you feel that the statement you reverted was unfactual, or that the relevant forums are unreliable, why not edit the statement to that effect instead? (e.g. Several users of martial arts forums report that groin attacks against women have been as effective as those against males.)

Granted, a light impact will not be as effective, but a proper kick to the groin will be equally incapacitating to a woman as to a man, even when the pelvic bone is not broken.

Zuiram 17:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Users of martial arts forums commonly report that their teacher knows instant death-touch moves, that they could win the UFC, or that they fucked someone's mom. Anonymous reports from anonymous people on an Internet forum in a field well-known for delusion and bullshit do not constitute "documentation" of any kind. I'm not editing the sentence to make it more neutral because "several users on martial arts forums" are laughably, ridiculously, ludicrously, what-the-fuck-are-you-thinking not noteworthy enough to be included. Should we start changing articles on literature and philosophy any time "several users on Internet forums" share a particular opinion about the subject?

I would urge you to find some better comparative medical data on groin injuries than the personal testimony of vxS00pahD00pahD1MM4Kxv on some Mickey Mouse martial arts forum. --Halloween jack 19:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

What kind of forums have you been reading?

And, please, could you at least make a passing attempt at being civil?

I made a polite inquiry because of a puzzlingly harsh and undescriptive log message.

I find your comment insulting, which I will pretend to assume was not your intent.

My medical expertise is constrained to psychopharmacologic treatment of depression, anxiety and developmental disorders. Hence, if anyone wants medical data, they'll have to supply it themselves.

As someone who has had occasion to use groin kicks against both genders, I'm inclined to add the anecdotes of sensible people (which does not count Mr. SuperDuperDimMak) to my own experiences where they are congruent, and draw a conclusion based on that. I'm not inclined to take everything I see by J. Random User on UberLeetBullshidoMcDojo Forum #4 as gospel, which you seem to imply, but my experiences are not valid source material for the article.

What's your issue with martial artists, anyway? Sturgeon's Law doesn't apply more to us than everyone else, it's just that crap MA-wannabes are a lot more vocal than many others. :P

Zuiram 23:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)