User talk:Hale-Byrne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Hale-Byrne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Irishpunktom\talk 13:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Concerning your persistent removal of all information critical of baroness Cox, there is a Talk page where you are invited to discuss your concerns and reasons for removal. --Irishpunktom\talk 13:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox
Please be aware of the Three revert rule which states that you cannot make more than three reverts to an article in any 24-hour period. You should also be prepared to discuss your edits on the talk page of the article concerned, to try to reach consensus. David | Talk 16:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Concerning your persistent removal of all information critical of baroness Cox, there is a Talk page where you are invited to discuss your concerns and reasons for removal. --Irishpunktom\talk 13:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Some advice:
 This policy in a nutshell: |
| Do not revert any single page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours. (Or else an Administrator may suspend your account.) |
Can you please discuss your reasons for the removal of the info ?--Irishpunktom\talk 16:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block
====Regarding reversions[1] made on April 24, 2006 (UTC) to Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox====
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 17:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox
User:Irishpunktom has requested some mediation (here) with regar to the above page. I have reviewed the page and its history and it seems that you are consistently removing the criticism section from the article. Articles on wikipedia should have a neutral point of view and so should detail all facets of the subject, both positive and negative. In order for people to understand why you think the information shouldn't be there, please can you discuss your thoughts on the article's talk page so that a resolution to the disagreement can be found. If you doubt the factual accuracy of the sections, please explain what is wrong. There are sources cited for the section, but I have requested Irishpunktom to provide some additional ones as the sources dont' cover all points. Please enter a discussion so that the disagreement about the article content can be resolved. Also, to try and avoid the revert war continuing, please refrain from editing the page until an agreement can be reached.Kcordina Talk 08:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do not change the title of this article without discussing it. David | Talk 15:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
You should not edit page whilst it is the subject of mediation. I am holding her business card in my hand. It says The Baroness Cox of Queensbury. Also on page 52 and 53 of her biography by Andrew Boyd, it describes the creation of her title with and the inclusion of the place name Queensbury. She is also styled Lady. Just call the House of Lords and ask the Sergeant-At-Arms. I can not we are even having this discussion. Please wait for mediation. Warm regards, Hale-Byrne.
[edit] Caroline Cox discussion
I'd just like to bring a couple of points to your attention with regard to the discussion. Firstly, please simply refer to people by their user names. People's roles/lives outside of wikipedia are not relevent to discussions here, and making reference to such is simply likely to atagonise people. Secondly, please sign comments you make to talk pages by appending four tildas (~~~~) to the end. That adds your username and the time and date, which makes it easy to see who is doing what in the discussion. Kcordina Talk 08:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- You can't just go around removing sourced information just because you don't like it. David | Talk 16:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Three revert rule
Please be aware that you have made three reverts to Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox. The three revert rule says that no editor should make more than three reverts in any 24 hour period. David | Talk 16:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I have now reported your fourth revert on WP:AN/3RR. If you want to avoid a block, you could reinsert the paragraph again. David | Talk 16:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
As all of these events/reverts occurred two days ago, therefore I have not blocked you for your violation of the 3RR. Please read WP:3RR and be aware that you should not revert or partial revert to the same version of an article in 24 hours. Thank you. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 15:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- You've reverted again and removed the paragraph. This is just not acceptable - if you have problems with this paragraph, explain what they are, but you can't just remove sourced and relevant information from an article. If you think it portrays an inaccurate impression, then the way to act is to correct the false impression by setting the information in context. Talk pages are your friend. David | Talk 19:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
