Halpern v. Canada (Attorney General)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Halpern v. Canada, [2003] O.J. No. 2268 is a notable June 10, 2003 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal where the Court found that the common law definition of marriage, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The unanimous Court found that the exclusion of same-sex couples was a clear violation of the Charter. In this respect the judgment followed much of what had been ruled elsewhere. Thus, the two same-sex marriages performed by Brent Hawkes on January 14, 2001 were legal on the day they were performed.[1]

Surprisingly, the Court also held that there was to be no suspension of the remedy as it applied to the general population and that the new definition allowing same-sex couples to marry would take effect immediately.