Höfle Telegram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Hofle Telegram.
Enlarge
The Hofle Telegram.

The Höfle Telegram[1] (or Hoefle Telegram) is a document discovered in 2000 among recently declassified World War II materials from the Public Record Office in Kew, England. The document consists of two messages, one to SS Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann in Berlin, and one to SS Oberststurmbannführer Heim, in Cracow, sent by SS Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle on January 11 1943. It gave arrivals in the prior fortnight, and arrivals for the year, for the camps of Einsatz Reinhardt (later more commonly called Aktion Reinhard) to December 31, 1942.

[edit] Translation

The translation of the decoded message that British intelligence intercepted is

          12.   OMX de OMQ         1000          89 ? ?
                State Secret! To the Reich Main Security Office, for
                the attention of SS Obersturmbannführer EICHMANN, BERLIN ...[gap] rest missed
        13/15   OLQ de OMQ         1005          83 234 250
                State Secret! To the Senior Commander of the Security Police,
                for the attention of SS Oberststurmbannführer HEIM, CRACOW.
                Regarding: fortnightly report Einsatz REINHARDT. Reference: radio telegram therefrom
                Recorded arrivals until 31.12.42, L 12761, B 0, S 515, T 10335 together
                23611. Situation...[gap] 31.12.42, L 24733, B 434508, S 101370,
                T 71355, together 1274166.
                SS and Police Leader Lublin, HÖFLE, Sturmbannführer.

For clarity the figures may be arranged as a table:[2][3]

    Recorded arrivals for the 2 weeks until 31 December 1942        Sum total as at 31 December 1942
    L (Lublin Majdanek)     12 761                                      24 733
    B (Belzec)                   0                                     434 508
    S (Sobibor)                515                                     101 370
    T (Treblinka}           10 335                                     713 555(See *Note)
    Together                23 611                                   1 274 166


[edit] Importance of the document

According to the US National Security Agency, "It appears the British analysts who had decrypted the message missed the significance of this particular message at the time. No doubt this happened because the message itself contained only the identifying letters for the death camps followed by the numerical totals. The only clue would have been the reference to Operation Reinhard, the meaning of which – the plan to eliminate Polish Jewry that was named after the assassinated SS General Reinhard Heydrich – also probably was unknown at the time to the codebreakers at Bletchley."

This document is only the second to detail the numbers involved in the execution of Einsatz Reinhardt (the other is Korherr’s report, which makes use of the figures in this radio telegram).

Apart from indicating the numbers for 1942, it also indicates that the camp at Lublin (Majdanek), was part of Odilo Globocnik's "Einsatz Reinhardt", a fact that historians previously had not realised.

The discovery of these exact numbers has raised questions as to where the Jews that were admitted to the respective camps came from. At this stage it is still speculative.[2]

[edit] Footnotes / references

  1. ^ Public Record Office, Kew, England, HW 16/23, decode GPDD 355a distributed on January 15, 1943, radio telegrams nos 12 and 13/15, transmitted on January 11, 1943.
  2. ^ a b Peter Witte and Stephen Tyas, “A New Document on the Deportation and Murder of Jews during ‘Einsatz Reinhardt’ 1942,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 15:3 (2001) pp. 468-486.
  3. ^ This is a decoded message, presumably from an Enigma coded message. The interception and decoding was not 100% accurate (the "?" and the "...[gap]" entries). A missing "5" is added in the table, and is considered to be the correct figure, because (1) The number 713555 yields the correct total of 1274166, and (2) These figures were quoted verbatim in the Korherr Report, with the exception of the "71355", which was given as "713555" by Korherr. The British decoded version would be almost certainly a transcription error. Since British security clearly did not realise what this telegram was about (see below), it is unlikely that the mistake would have been noticed at the time.
In other languages