Talk:Guyball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on August 11, 2006. The result of the discussion was No Consensus. |
[edit] Image Help
This article would be greatly improved with an image can be included. There are images of Guy wearing a Topmiler, but we would need permission to use them due to copyright. So if anyone can get an image, that would be great.
- There are a couple of photos of a game in progress on Flickr [1], taken by script writer James Henry, but again permission would be required. —82.46.154.93 01:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Have you tried asking Mr. Henry? ISD 5 April 2006.
[edit] community service match
There's a whole heap of new terms and such from the new episode (series two, episode four). If anyone has the script or caught the captioning, they really would be good to add. Tphi 01:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not deserving of own article
Come ONNNN fellas - while Green Wing is hilarious, is there any call for a separate encyclopaedia article about a fictitious game that is mentioned in a single episode? I think not... ElectricRay 22:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I believe it is. Firstly of all, it is mentioned in several episodes, mostly in series 2. Secondly, it might be mentioned more heavily in the Chirstmas Special. Thirdly, if you were to leave it out, it would like not mentioning Mornington Crescent in I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue! Guyball is interesting, and should have it's own article.
- Mornington Crescent has spawned its own life - there are books, websites and entirely distinct radio shows about it, etc. Not sure if Guyball is quite there yet. Not denying it is funny, though... ElectricRay 08:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Well I think it should stay. Let's wait and see what happens in the Christmas Special, something might be mentioned. ISD 12:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
The wikipedia entry for Guyball has been mentioned in the British Sitcom Guide's Green Wing newsletter. If it is mentioned in the newsletter, then it should deserve an entry. ISD 18:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm - I reluctantly acquiesce, but I don't find this very compelling - a bit circular, no? It's notable enough to be included in Wikipedia because the Wikipedia entry has been cited by the public source? ElectricRay 16:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
