Talk:Guardians of Ga'Hoole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 "To Be a King" 2 The Coming of Hoole 3 POV and Copyvio 4 The Movie 5 Kielian Snakes 6 Possible Move 7 Getting Rid Of Fan Links 8 The River Of Wind 9 Crystal-ballism 10 "Complete Rewrite?"

[edit] "To Be a King"

Does anyone have any verification of the title of the upcoming eleventh book in the series? Amazon has no listing. JaredW! 12:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

In the back of "The First Collier", there is a picture and a summary of the eleventh book, confirming the title name.

Also, if you go here you can see it. -- Pejmany

[edit] The Coming of Hoole

Quick! Get an exclusive sneak peek at Guardians of Ga'hoole #10: The Coming of Hoole. Just click here!

[edit] POV and Copyvio

Some one has been going through the books listed on this page and creating very POV articles which look like potential copyright violations. I have never heard of these books, but if someone who is a fan can clear them up, it would be a good idea--Jackyd101 02:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I run The Great Ga'Hoole Tree, a Guardians fansite, and I've read through this entire article. Everything is correct, except for a few misspellings.

The summaries aren't copyrighted as far as I know, the "Here is the extraordinary summary of this amazing book" is POV and I'll change that. --Fantasylover12 19:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Movie

I think it should be in cgi (like narnia wolves)

[edit] Kielian Snakes

Do they exist? Dora Nichov 07:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Possible Move

It has long been a position on Wikipedia that slashes should not be used in article titles; because of this, I believe that all the subpages of this article relating to books in this series, such as Ga'hoole/The_Journey should be moved to their own articles without slashes. If there are no objections to this by September 17, I will make the move. Quaerere 23:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree, but why haven't you moved it yet?
KINGALEX56 CONTRIBUTES TO WIKIPEDIA! 20:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I and other editor moved the actual articles, such that the article titles with slashes are merely redirects. If you want to bypass these redirects in articles that refer to them, feel free when you edit the article next. — TKD::Talk 20:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Getting Rid Of Fan Links

Why did the links have to be deleted. Some ga'hoole fans really want their fansites to be promoted and this is a great way. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bettyfizzw (talk • contribs) 19:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

That is precisely what we're not here to do. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 23:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry I don't understand all of wikipedia's ways yet, but are you guys going to put em back? - Bettyfizzw

Nope. For highly popular bands that have many fansites, a link to one major site might be appropriate. Otherwise, "fanlistings are generally not informative and should not ordinarily be included." See WP:EL for more details on external links. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 14:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The River Of Wind

Can someone give an actual link to the scholastic page where The River Of Wind info is found. Thanks! -Bettyfizzw

Here you go: http://www.scholastic.com/internationalrights/book.asp?productid=5588 -Maverick

[edit] Crystal-ballism

I've removed some unsourced speculation per WP:NOT a crystal ball. If it can be properly sourced please feel free to re-add it. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Complete Rewrite?"

Does anyone support a complete rewrite of this article and possibly some of the relating ones on the basis that: a) It is not in the tone expected of an encyclopaedia b) It is not neutral and c) Needs to be wikified It appears rather messy right now and I believe that it needs a complete rewrite that deals with the above said issues. Any opinions?Yuanchosaan 10:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

If no one objects then I shall begin revision of this article in one week's time(2/12/06). Yuanchosaan 09:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Major Cleanup Is Now Complete! I have rewritten this article as it would've been in a real encyclopedia. All the necessary information was left and the unneccessary deleted. I have tidied up and organized this article in the best possible of ways, so it was not messy as before. Unfortunately, I, probably like many others, have felt that The Characters and the Owl Words information was unneccessary, and clogged up the whole article. Therefore it was deleted. Organization is priority number one, and it has been achieved by me. I hope you enjoy the newer, better version of this article. If you have any dislikes, questions, comments or concerns, please, immediately post them on my talk page. I will be glad to answer. Thank you! Bookwormreader 02:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much for that clean up. I'll just add an infobox to this article. Yuanchosaan 06:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)