User talk:GroundedZero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

>I* didn't put the NPOV header there, I was only restoring it after somebody had deleted it. The NPOV >discussion is on the Talk page.

Yes, marking article as NPOV is controversial because it's about the images after all. They're factual.

>And why are you signing postings as Eloquence? RickK 21:31, 1 >May 2004 (UTC)

My mistake. Added quotation marks.

>Have you even read the discussion on the Talk page as to how NPOV the selection of the photos is? >And don't try to claim that you know my position on this article, because you're wrong. [[User:>RickK|Rick]]K 21:36, 1 May 2004 (UTC)

Yes, that's were i copied the quotation.

Hi GroundedZero, I have made some attempts at making the image descriptions for the photos from the Daily Mirror neutral. Before I changed them the descriptions made the assumption that the pictures were genuine (something yet to be proved, and of which I am not entirely convinced). -- Ams80 22:40, 1 May 2004 (UTC)