Talk:Group cohomology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

In the column "Formal construction", is there a "g_n+1" missing in the definition of d^n?


no.

The only reference link, Turkelli, Szilágyi, Lukács: Cohomology of Groups, is a broken link.

The formula for d^n does look a little strange.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../g/r/o/Talk%7EGroup_cohomology_65e5.html"