Growth rate (group theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In group theory, the growth rate of a group with respect to a symmetric generating set describes the size of balls in the group. Every element in the group can be written as a product of generators, and the growth rate counts the number of elements that can be written as a product of length n.

Contents

[edit] Definition

Suppose G is a finitely generated group; and T is a finite symmetric set of generators (symmetric means that if x \in T then x^{-1} \in T). Any element x \in G can be expressed as a word in the T-alphabet

x = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot a_k \mbox{ where } a_i\in T

Let us consider the subset of all elements of G which can be presented by such a word of length ≤n

B_n(G,T) = \{x\in G | x = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot a_k \mbox{ where } a_i\in T \mbox{ and } k\le n\}

This set is just the closed ball of radius n in the word metric d on G with respect to the generating set T:

B_n(G,T) = \{x\in G | d(x, e)\le n\}

More geometrically, Bn(G,T) is the set of vertices in the Cayley graph with respect to T which are within distance n of the identity.

Given two nondecreasing positive functions a and b one can say that they are equivalent (a\sim b) if there is a constant C such that

a(n/ C) \leq b(n) \leq a(Cn),

for example p^n\sim q^n if p,q > 1.

Then the growth rate of the group G can be defined as the corresponding equivalence class of the function

\#(n)=|B_n(G,T)|,

where | Bn(G,T) | denotes the number of elements in the set Bn(G,T). Although the function \#(n) depends on the set of generators T its rate of growth does not (see below) and therefore the rate of growth gives an invariant of a group.

The word metric d and therefore sets Bn(G,T) depend on the generating set T. However, any two such metrics are bilipschitz equivalent in the following sense: for finite symmetric generating sets E, F, there is a positive constant C such that

{1\over C} \ d_F(x,y) \leq d_{E}(x,y) \leq C \ d_F(x,y).

As an immediate corollary of this inequality we get that the growth rate does not depend on the choice of generating set.

[edit] Polynomial and exponential growth

If \#(n)\le C(n^k+1) for some C,k<\infty we say that G has a polynomial growth rate. The infimum k0 of such k's is called the order of polynomial growth. According to Gromov's theorem, a group of polynomial growth is almost nilpotent, i.e. it has a nilpotent subgroup of finite index. In particular, the order of polynomial growth k0 has to be a natural number and in fact \#(n)\sim n^{k_0}.

If \#(n)\ge a^n for some a > 1 we say that G has an exponential growth rate. Every finitely generated G has at most exponential growth, i.e. for some b > 1 we have \#(n)\le b^n.

If \#(n) grows more slowly than any exponential function, G has a subexponential growth rate. Any such group is amenable.

[edit] Examples

  • A free group with a finite rank k > 1 has an exponential growth rate.
  • Z2 has a polynomial growth rate of order 2.
  • The lamplighter group has an exponential growth. This is a rare example of a solvable group with exponential growth.
  • The existence of groups with intermediate growth, i.e. subexponential but not polynomial was open for many years. It was asked by Milnor in 1968 and was finally answered in the positive by Grigorchuk in 1984. There are still open questions in this area and a complete picture of which orders of growth are possible and which are not is missing.

[edit] See also

Connections to isoperimetric inequalities

[edit] References