Talk:Gordon Gekko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot overview, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. We are always looking for new members! Join us today!

[edit] copyvio?

I don't see this as a copyvio myself, so have reverted for now. Please comment here on how this is a copyvio. Thanks. Guinness 13:58, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removed quotes

I removed the section of "representative quotes" from the movie. I didn't think they fit the article and they would belong better on Wikiquote. - furrykef (Talk at me) 00:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

I reverted the removal. I see lots of these types of quotes for movie and other fiction related pages. It is not at all unusual. -- JJay 00:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the removal. The quotes are useless out of context... --Rehcsif 15:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I've pared down the quotes, amongst some other shuffling-around. Many of them weren't really "representative" at all and a couple were badly misquoted. Geoff NoNick 14:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] First paragraph needs to be toned down

The first paragraph is absurdly biased regarding the author's obviously dim view towards the corporate world.