Talk:Gnomeo and Juliet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Future This article has been rated as Future-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot overview, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. We are always looking for new members! Join us today!

[edit] Clear Bias, non-standard editing.

I don't think I really need to go into much detail here, folks. The article is not written in a proper manner, and contains a large bias against John Lasseter and Ed Catmull. Caleb Osment 13:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. This article needs a significant overhaul. Rhindle The Red 02:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I have merged information from Gnomeo and Juliet (2006 film) as per an Articles for Deletion, probably not helping matters much. I don't know enough the subject to help, but the article needed help, even before I did this long overdue merge!!

--Slp1 23:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] To the user who wrote that long essay

Your IP address changes, so there seems to be no way to contact you directly (although I do suspect that I may know who you are), so I will post my message here:

Wikipedia is not a soapbox.

Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not carefully. Although by looking at your history I see that you have made many important contributions, your recent addition to this article was innapropriate in tone and read like a blog entry rather than like an encyclopedic article. I'm sure that there were ways to say most of what you wished to say about the film's process of creation without creating a mess that other editors will now have to clean up as best they can. All I ask is that you use a bit more discretion next time and try not to post something if you know full-well that it is innapropriate and that someone else will have to fix it. Thanks.

Better yet, I'm sure that all of us would be thankfull if you could find some sources for your allegations and reworded things to be more encyclopedic. --Esn 06:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)