Talk:Glass ceiling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Why is "glass cliff" a separate entry? It's derivative of glass ceiling. If that is a separate entry, shouldn't "celluloid ceiling," etc. be too? Yyyikes 01:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)yyyyikes
DicDef, stolen from www.m-w.com. Delete unless expanded -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:46, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Clearly unacceptable as it stands, with its proud statement of copyviolation. Can't decide if it could become an article. Would any article that would arise essentially be an extended etymology? --bodnotbod 23:52, May 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Move to Wikipedia:Copyright problems -- Cyrius|✎ 01:01, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
- I fixed it up. Should be a decent stub now. -- VV 02:00, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
-
- comment: As a new person, I can't help think it's still a dic.def. but now with added links. I think it's a good thing to define, but perhaps the 'glass ceiling' thing should just be a part of the articles you've helpfully linked to? I'll see what others have to say.--bodnotbod 02:56, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
- V's cleanup looks fine. Keep. Alcarillo 02:27, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. We shouldn't create artificial barriers preventing this now fine stub from becoming a full article. TB 08:29, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep the fixed version. Andris 05:02, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep the new version. --VTEX 05:26, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
- keep, of course. Does anybody bother trying to edit these articles, or is it just the practice to VfD anytime one's blood pressure increases while reading the encyclopedia?SimBot2 17:49, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
- I found some information on the article in which the term was coined: "Hymowitz, C. & Schellhardt, T.D. The glass-ceiling: Why women can't seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs . The Wall Street Journal, 24 March 1986." The two authors are Carol Hymowitz and Timothy Schellhardt. I've included the full information here in case you want to change the way I've added it to the article Nathan J. Yoder 08:00, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Statistics were copied from 'Feminism' and are now marked as neutrality disputed in that article. I'm not sure if it is a good idea to copy it rather than using the existing link since the any changes will have to be manually added like this.
- I don't see what the dispute is about those statistics. There are some comparability issues, but I don't know of any neutrality issues.(Yyyikes 00:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC))
- I removed the reference to "officially" in the opening sentence, because this is a vague non-reference. I don't think there is an "official" glass ceiling, though the Glass Ceiling Commission came close I suppose.(Yyyikes 00:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC))
- I removed the "worldwide stats," since they were about % of women in parliament, and Glass Ceiling usually refers to management or other occupations, not elected positions (see text in this entry, which doesn't mention elected positions)(Yyyikes 14:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)).
[edit] Definitional adjustment
I don't doubt that the term "glass ceiling" originally applied primarily to women, but the last few times I have heard it, it included other types of discrimination. So I tried to make the first paragraph a lot more general. Revert at will. Uranographer 13:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
The term "glass ceiling" was in use by female managers and female engineers at Hewlett-Packard circa 1979. -- Kate
- Would it be possible to generalize the definition of "glass ceiling" to make its usage less exclusive to just discrimination against women? I've heard it used in the context of racial discrimination in the workplace as well. So although the historical origins of the word and primary usage may be related to gender, I think a broader definition or at least some mention of other relevant populations that the term applies to would be useful. --Drenched 00:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yeah for my part i've heard this term used in the context of all kinds of discrimination, not just exclusive to women. Walk0nwalls 01:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Note the article says "The extension to other groups, such as racial or ethnic minorities, is usually made with direct or indirect reference to gender." Even this is tenuous because there are no references to uses outside of gender. Gender is the reference for this concept, as the original category; others are derivative. Let's see some examples or references before expanding this aspect. Yyyikes 23:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Keep it
I think that it is fine by itself for now. I don't think that it needs to be changed. swat671