Image talk:Glasses 800 edit.png

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What was the render time for this picture? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.218.231.141 (talk • contribs).

560 hours. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-08-02 00:19
Damn... thats incredible... Ghostalker
Using what computer, a 486? That's over 23 days! ---Majestic- 02:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
*Fails to comprehend.* Great picture though.--Mark (Talk | Contribs | Email) 20:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


It's interesting that this image was not promoted to Featured status on Commons where 1/3 voted against it. Shawnc 01:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wow!

I can't even take pictures that look that good; the 23-day total rendering time was worth it.

It just looks so real; you could have told me you took the picture with a camera and I wouldn't have noticed! Craig3410 05:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

That is an incredible picture. raptor 13:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Sir, I didn't really think this was a 3-D rendered thing. So be happy! You fooled me into thinking it was a photograph. --Kitty who? 18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
It really does look real. Excellent work :) --WikiSlasher 10:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cool

if you guys did not tell me that this was Raytraced, i would believe it's true

lobotron

[edit] Rendering of alcohol

I find this picture incredibly realistic, but I can't help feeling that the glasses contents are just red and yellow water rather than, say, wine and whisky. Are there any technical difficulties in rendering realistic-looking alcohol, or was this by design? 84.98.220.28 10:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maybe someone should add this to computer graphics

Could someone please add this to 3D_Computer_Graphics? Thankx. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.249.77.167 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../g/l/a/Image_talk%7EGlasses_800_edit.png_31d6.html"