User talk:Geomapboy2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] unblock
I'm not sure why you've placed the unblock tag on your page since your username itself is not blocked, you maybe blocked as collateral damage from another block, but we don't read minds here, you need to post the details of the block message so we can look into it. --pgk(talk) 23:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] rfa
I would like to nominate myself for an admin position on wikipedia. I have been comming to this wesite since 2005 and i have over 200 page creations mostly on articles associated with North and South Carolina. I think i would do one hell of a job as a wikipedia administrator. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Geomapboy2 (talk • contribs).
- It's really up to you man, but you might want to withdraw your request and come back after a few months more experience. Let me know if you want to talk about it. Regards, Alphachimp talk 06:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Adminship
It is my regretful task to inform you that I have closed your request for adminship early as unlikely to achieve consensus. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had their first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhelmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Wikipedia, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 09:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thnkas
I just wanted to thank you for all your contributions to our hospital articles! Don't get down about your RfA, my RfA just failed a few hours ago as well =D. --mboverload@ 09:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your VandalProof Application
Dear Geomapboy2,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen 02:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)