Talk:George W. Bush/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article has pictures, infoboxes, subheadings, good info, etc. It might be a good article candidate soon. A big problem, however, is that the article is too long, especially on Bush's first term. This info should be moved to the related articles. Green caterpillar 19:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Biography Assess
I have mirrored this article's assessment with respect to that as being a US History article. I wasn't sure whether or not this article had the support of the Politician's workforce so didn't comment on such. I felt that this article surpassed the criteria for being a B. However, like the original assessor for the US History assessment, didn't feel that this article had met the criteria for being a Good Article. I have put this as being TOP priorirty in respect of it's importance. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 23:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)