Talk:George Deutsch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

I'm not sure if it fits but Deutsch may have a history of making questionable comments in articles he wrote while writing for the Texas A&M Battalion. This includes embracing the defense inspired theory that Satanists were likely the ones who murdered Laci Peterson. This blogger documents some of his writings here http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/2006/02/04.html

note - I edited my own previous comments and realized I had not signed it properly the first go around. I'm new and learning. Mr Christopher 05:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

It would probably be a good idea to provide some context to the link to Michael Brown. Yes, I understand that Brown is another controversial Bush political appointee but that information should be provided for future reference. Otherwise, it looks like Brown has something to do directly with the situation at hand. I'm going to edit that, actually. Moonsword 17:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

I've re-added the MDB link, since MDB and this man were both: (a) Bush appointees who (b) worked for Mr. Bush's reelection campaign and (c) we're found to have fishy resumes and (d) resigned after some scandal during W's second term. They would have to be identical twins to have more of a connection. 68.183.117.254 04:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

It would be good to include a section that shows the before and after texts about the Big Bang to show what this guy did to the scientific presentation. His "contribution" was no better than the stickers placed on textbooks by creationists. However, there should be a clear distinction between what scientists were saying at NASA and how he perverted those statements.

Look here: "http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2006/02/george_deutsch.html"

64.24.44.162 17:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)UncleBucky.