Talk:Genoism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Unencyclopedic

It would seem this article goes against Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. Given that the use of this term derives from only one source, and that's fictional, I'm not sure the status of "genoism" even rises above protologism. It is an interesting concept, to be sure, but I don't know that this is the place for it. ENeville 20:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I've seen so many protologism articles that it's probably best to just keep them as long as both origin and popularity can be determined, which is pretty easy in this case given it's a top 250 movie. --Zero g 01:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger

I don't think the article as it is fits into Gattaca. It's better suited for a merge with genetic discrimination. --Zero g 14:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)