Talk:Gallery of confusable flags

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gallery of confusable flags is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).


Contents

[edit] ("Tribar")

What does "Tribars" mean in the context of this article? I don't see the threeness involved. Now if you had Latvia and Austria, then you might call them "tribars"... AnonMoos 17:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I reckon so... "dual-bar", "two-bar", "bibar" (!) instead...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
A stupid cut-and-paste error I think -- thanks for catching it. I replaced the section heading with "bicolor", as in Gallery of bicolor flags. Cheers, --ScottMainwaring 20:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] [1]

(rv - please note disclaimer in introduction: "organized by the number of main colors (disregarding, for example, colors in emblems)")

I felt the examples I moved involved three colors (albeit one passively) regardless of emblems...?  Perhaps the disclaimer needs rephrasing/extension...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 04:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On the one hand, on the other

I'm beginning to wonder if spectra rather than sections might be more effective in this article... For instance, looking at the flags in #Blue at hoist onward, the following groupings seem as viable:

...etc
Poland Chile Texas N. Carolina

Canton with star
added, darker red

Canton becomes
vertical band

Star emblem in band,
red/white swapped


...etc
Puerto Rico Cuba W. Papua Liberia Malaysia USA

Triangle/stripe colors swapped

Triangle becomes band,
more stripes

Band becomes canton
(plus color swap again)

Star in canton becomes sun-moon emblem

Multiple stars
in canton

...in other words, create bands of flags where slight differences between each (of any kind) mean the first and last flag in each band might be significantly different from each other...?   Intriguing article, David Kernow (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Fascinating idea, but I see a couple of problems. First, I'm not sure that these complex morphing relationships of similarity can be captured along a single linear dimension; seems like branching would be required, tree-structures or some such, probably beyond the representational capability of Mediawiki. Second, I think this invites many more direct and indirect relations of similarity to be represented here, leading to this page ending up listing every flag in the world; but the intent of this page (originally a section of text on the Flag page) was to list the most "egregious" examples of similarity in flag design, as a kind of cautionary resource for readers interested in flag identification. --ScottMainwaring 15:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough; I agree re the linear limitation and page intent, plus the POV ordering (i.e. I recognize that other folk might prefer different orders). I noticed, however, that the layout I evolved above does bring more flags into view, so perhaps something like it might be used on the page...?   Thanks for your feedback, David (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
PS Perhaps not appropriate for this page, but maybe one NPOV criterion for a linear list of similar flags would be year of introduction...?

[edit] TOC

Have created a custom TOC as the automated TOC was becoming lengthy. Unfortunately, as there doesn't seem to be an automated equivalent at present (cf here), this will need to be updated manually whenever first or second-level headings are added/amended/removed. Hope this acceptable, David Kernow (talk) 02:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
PS Re the threads above, anyone else reading this page...?

I think the new table of contents is much improved. Thanks! --ScottMainwaring 15:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Glad you approve. Hopefully a more configuarable automated TOC will be implemented some day...  regards, David (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] White space

I'm finding when I look at the page that there's a lot of flags which look odd because they have a white section which isn't differentiated from the white background - particularly the Red/white flags section. Some have a thin red line round the white which gives the shape of it, but others don't, meaning that section looks almost like a selection of red rectangles in various shades and positions. I notice on the main "Gallery of Flags of Sovereign Countries", that all flags have some delineation of their whitespace - would it be possible to link to these images instead? Or, failing that, to background the flags on this page in grey? Brickie 13:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)