User talk:Fuzzy510

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] NCAA Women's Brackets

I see you've created a page for the 2004 NCAA Women's bracket. I wrote some scripts to generate all the historical NCAA Men's brackets (see Template:NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament) so I could presumably generate similar pages for all of the women's brackets. If you have some input, let me know. Otherwise, I'll get going shortly. --Dantheox 08:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hey fuzzy510, good to see you're helping out. If you have any questions, check out my vi talk page. -- vi 23:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Likewise! And thanks for your work on HFStival, Mr. Fuzz. --keepsleeping slack off! 19:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use images

Hello. I noticed you added the NBA team logos to the draft page. However, note that the NBA logos are fair use and fair use policy dictates that the use of the image must not be purely decorative. Unless you can justify the use of these fair use images, they are going to have to be removed. Pepsidrinka 03:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I noticed you seem to be into editing draft articles. Perhaps you should take a look at the featured list criteria and also take a look at 2005 NFL Draft and its corresponding featured list nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2005 NFL Draft. From my view of your edit patterns, you could probably churn out many featured lists in with all the draft lists you edit. Pepsidrinka 03:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking pages

Hi, please don't blank pages thanks. I've fixed it for you now. :) --Downwards 06:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks. I was going to get around to it tonight anyways, but I certainly appreciate the help. :-D --fuzzy510 06:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tagging w/o discussion.

Hello,

You tagged Jim Phelan with {{dispute}}, but failed to explain the purpose of the tag; what gives??? Folajimi 02:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Czukay-Sylvian 's albums

Hello, I noticed you included Flux and Mutability in progressive rock album stub cathegory. Well, it's not correct, that album is a typical example of Ambient music with influences from Ethno and World music, in other words it is often regarded as a "New Age" album. Could you please explain why you think its prog rock? Regards.Brian Wilson 13:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

hello, fuzzy510, thank you for replying. Ok, if it is so important for you, feel free to keep that stub for now, I'll expand the text within this weekend. I bought those two albums, Plight and Premonition and Flux and Mutability when they were first released in vynil, around 1988-89; I can ensure that they are universally regarded as Ambient or New Age, never as prog rock. This is the evidence that AllMusic is not trustable at all, despite the fact that young Wikipedians regard it as a sort of bible. A reference site for every genre related to prog rock, electronic rock, experimental music, ambient and new age is www.scaruffi.com Brian Wilson 10:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Deletion tags

Hi,

Thanks for helping out by tagging articles for deletion. Please remember that the criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD) are quite narrow. Suspected violation of a notability guideline (like WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, etc.) is NOT a reason for speedy deletion, only for listing an article on PROD or AfD. You recently marked Pure Yak Frenzy for speedy deletion, but your reason for the speedy did not match any CSD. In the future, if you are concerned only about the notability of an article, it is better to mark it with PROD or send it to AfD. Thanks again and happy wiki-ing!, Xoloz 17:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BiLoCenter.gif listed for deletion

—ccwaters 02:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talledega

Hi I have contested your proposed deletion of the Talledega picture. It is currently the only image available for this article on Wikipedia or the commons. If you'd like to contribute a free pic then by all means do so, however until that time there is no valid reason to delete it. Yes a picture can be taken, but unless you are willing to provide one that is not a valid deletion criteria. Gateman1997 07:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I believe you are misreading #1. "If a free alternative exists" refers to if one exists on Wikipedia or the commons, which none currently does. It does not refer to if one could eventually be made available. Also if you would please reread that section it also asks that if you know a free image exists you should replace it. So unless you're going to do so I believe this IFD is out of order at this time. Gateman1997 18:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Age

many thanx for your New age stub template, it surely will work better than that prog rock one. I dont love the term "new age" when it claims to mean sort of relgious-movement-that-becomes-religion; if it is used as work-in-progress-walk-towards-the-infinite-respecting-other-religions it is ok for me. Brian Wilson 00:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Splitting the US-stadia...

This was my first proposal in this area, now archived here. As we're supposed to follow the structure of the permanent categories, we have three possible alternatives: by sport, by location (state, or region of states), or by type of structure (most obviously, the indoors, vs the "ball parks"). Alai 06:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baseball stubs

I just wanted to compliment you on the creation of all the new baseball stub cats. I also appreciate the amount of energy you are putting into the stub sorting. Well done ! -- No Guru 16:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stub sorting

In this task, you are replacing football stub with football club stub for some international sides: they are not football clubs. I have reverted Guam: I fear you may have done lots of others. Kevin McE 01:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

You refer elsewhere to a 60 article threshhold: I am not clear whether a stub category should have more or less than this threshhold amount. If you need to split it further, I would suggest that this could be done by conference (UEFA, OCF, CONCACAF etc)

[edit] hello

Hello,