Talk:Fundamental lemma of calculus of variations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think the proof is important - some students use wikipedia to help them understand what they learn in lectures better. Plenty of other pages have proofs: for example Noether's theorem, (and it is one of the main reasons I use wikipedia). This is a quite a short proof. Oh yeah, and I missed out the details of h(x) because they were written in the statement of the lemma (h ∈ C2[a,b] with h(a) = h(b) = 0)
[edit] Proof of the principle
The proof is by contradiction:
Assume that for some c in the interior of the interval one has f(c) = 2e > 0.
By continuity, and the intermediate value theorem, there exists a neighbourhood [c0,c1] of c within [x0,x1] on which f(x) > e. Then,
That gives a contradiction: therefore the only way for the integral to be zero in general is if
-
- Your proof is still wrong. How do you know that
-
- also, how do you know that
-
- ?
-
- The function h needs to be chosen such that h(a) = h(b) = 0 but more is needed. It must be non-negative, and positive only in the small interval [c0,c1]. Why does such a function exist? Things are a bit more complicated than what you wrote. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- It is not hard to find such an h, but the proof above is certainly sloppy. The first inequality is just wrong, and there is no need for the Intermediate Value Theorem. -cj67
-
[edit] External Links
I have removed the link to a web page that only contains a proof of the Euler-Lagrange equation, but not of the lemma. I'd guess that some sort of Hilbert space basis is needed for a proof, but I haven't actually seen any proof of this lemma... Anyone have a good book handy? --Shastra 20:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)