Talk:Full Circle Temple
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Would everyone please remember to type ~~~~ after contributing to the talk page. I cannot tell at all who is initiating conversation and who is responding to whom on this page. - BanyanTree 03:29, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Beware
A certain corporate officer for Full Circle Temple, Inc., has edited out most of the contents (true information and facts) for public-relationship purposes (because they don't want certain publicity here!). Any subsequent edits done by any officer or council member are therefore to be of dubious credibility. For the older uncut text, see the "page history."
[edit] Page "Vandalism"
The Full Circle Temple page has been frequently vandalized by one of the leaders of this "temple." If you look at the history page, you can see how she wanted to turn this into a corporate propaganda/advertisement.
User talk:67.40.194.159 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Please do not remove large portions of text from pages without explaining why you are doing so; this is considered vandalism and may result in your temporarily being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Grunt (talk) 01:00, 2004 Aug 29 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be prevented from editing Wikipedia. -- Grunt (talk) 01:10, 2004 Aug 29 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
To remain true to the spirit of Wikipedia, please read the Neutral Point of View section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPOV ) before further editing.
[edit] Changes to this Page
Members of Full Circle Temple's council have made changes to this page in order to protect the privacy of community members, and also to conform with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy.
According to materials created by Full Circle Temple, women on the Temple Council are called Council Members, not "officers". When 67.42.216.89 changed the words of Temple goddess, 67.42.216.89 was showing bias and not presenting "true information and facts" as was purported to be valuable in other places on the Discussion page.
It would seem the purpose of the 'edit' function of the Discussion page is to add to the conversation, not to put words in other people's mouths. --Witchee 21:20, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV and appropriateness of insiders writing PR materials into a neutral, third-party encyclopedia
Possible conflict of interest?
[edit] Disputed Neutrality?
Please list examples of where bias is shown in the current version.
Also, please read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DR
[edit] Silence says more than words
From the tutorial on NPOV: "Some Wikipedians, in the name of NPOV, try to avoid making any statements that other people find offensive or objectionable, even if objectively true. This is not the intent of NPOV."
As one can see above, board members (or clergy) working for "Full Circle Temple" kept deleting factual information because they fear embarassment and negative publicity when brought to public scrutiny.
[edit] Disputed Facts?
Which things that have been removed from this page should be reintroduced and why?
[edit] Removed Disputed Neutrality tag
This tag was put up on January 11, 2005 and no action has been taken on it for almost 3 months. Where is the dispute? Witchee 21:44, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
