From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] What my Wikipedia account is for
My first day as a Wikipedian (that is an account owner) and not just a user taught me a lot. I was blocked twice: first quite reasonably for an allegedly offensive name (therefore I do not cite it here) then unreasonably for daring to create another account on the same day - the given reason was "creating an account with the sole purpose of stalking" (the admin probably wrongly believed he has telepathic powers). That admin was soon afterwards desysopped for "his poor judgment, uncommunicativeness, wheel warring, and other misuses of administrator tools including rollback and blocking powers" but this did not unmake my initial frustrating experience. In spite of two bad starts on Wikipedia, I state here: this account has the sole purpose to help Wikipedia become even better. I hope I may be third time lucky.
Now, when the user whose many sockpuppets I tracked (and got five of them plus several IP numbers blocked) is finally banned, I have more time to improve the articles I like to work on. I also found anti-vandalism patrol an interesting passtime. The anti-vandal robots are doing a good job but are leaving many minor and sneaky vandalisms undetected. That'a why we, the human beings, are still needed, even in this field :-)
I also believe the userboxes are a funny way to show to the world as much as a user wishes to say about him/herself. Alas, recently an anti-userbox campaign has beed started on Wikipedia. Luckily, it seems a kind of consensus has been reached.
Recently, I concentrate mostly on editing several articles on science. My choice is rather broad (fundamental and aplied physics, climatology and even history) but that is simply because I have diverse scientific interests. Generally it's a lot of fun, unless one meets an uneducable editor with strong but unsubstantiated opinions. Finding verifiable sources for obvious facts which are then nitpicked as "not good enough" by someone who has no scholarly sources at all to support his opinions is even more tedious than writing grant proposals ;-)
[edit] Some useful Wikipedia links
[edit] Free speach
[edit] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
[edit] Bill of Rights, Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[edit] The European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or the rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
[edit] My awards
|
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
You have made huge contributions in keeping good and funny user boxes. Keep up the great work! Heltec talk |
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
B4n1sh awards Friendly Neighbour this barnstar simply for having taught me all I know about Wikipedia with his User Page. B4n1sh 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC) |