Frenet-Serret formulas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In vector calculus, the Frenet-Serret formulas describe the kinematic properties of a particle which moves along a continuous, differentiable curve in three-dimensional space . More specifically, the formulas describe the derivatives of the tangent, normal, and binormal unit vectors in terms of each other. The formulas are named after their (independent) discoverers: the Frenchmen Jean Frédéric Frenet and Joseph Alfred Serret. The formulas were first described in the mid 19th century; however, the use of vector notation and linear algebra in writing them came much later.
Contents |
[edit] Frenet-Serret formulas
Let s(t) represent the distance which the particle has moved along the curve. Let r(t) represent the position vector of the particle. Then the tangent unit vector T is defined as
The normal unit vector N is defined as
and the binormal unit vector B is defined as
From equation (2) it follows, since T always has unit magnitude, that N is always perpendicular to T. From equation (3) it follows that B is always perpendicular to both T and N. Thus, the three unit vectors T, N, and B are all perpendicular to each other.
It can be proven, from the above, that
and
- .
Then the Frenet-Serret formulas are:
where κ is the curvature and τ is the torsion.
The three vectors: tangent, normal, and binormal, are collectively called the Frenet vectors. Together they form a basis for 3-space, which in turn defines a reference frame with its own coordinate system. The reference frame is called a Frenet frame, and it is neither static nor inertial, since the Frenet frame moves tangentially to the (non-straight) curve, so it is constantly accelerating. (The curve can be assumed to be parametrically dependent on time: i.e. the Frenet frame can be visualized kinematically).
The Frenet-Serret formulas are also known as Frenet-Serret theorem, and can be stated more concisely using matrix notation:
This matrix is skew-symmetric.
[edit] Proof
[edit] Part one
First prove equations (4) and (5). From equation (3) it follows that
- .
An identity for the vector triple product gives
Applying identity (7) to equation (6) yields
but N and T are perpendicular so that their dot product is zero. Also, T is always a unit vector, so the dot product of T with itself is always one. Therefore equation (8) simplifies to equation (4).
Now prove equation (5). From equation (4) it follows that
Applying identity (7) to equation (9) produces
but T and B are perpendicular so that their dot product is zero, and B is always a unit vector so that the dot product of B with itself is always unity. Therefore equation (10) simplifies to equation (5).
Equations (4) and (5) should be intuitively rather obvious.
[edit] Part two
Let κ equal the magnitude of dT / ds. Then the first Frenet-Serret formula follows from equation (2), where κ is the curvature of the particle's path.
Now to prove the third Frenet-Serret formula. We show that dB/ds is parallel to the normal by showing that it is perpendicular to both the tangent and binormal. Two vectors are perpendicular if their dot product is zero.
Therefore dB / ds is perpendicular to B. Applying the same method to the dot product of the binormal and tangent yields
- (by the first Frenet-Serret formula)
Hence dB / ds is also perpendicular to T. It then follows that dB / ds is parallel to N and can be written as a scalar multiple. Let
where τ is torsion, so that the third Frenet-Serret formula has been proven.
Lastly, prove the second Frenet-Serret formula. Equation (4) implies that
Applying the product rule for the cross product to this last equation yields
Next, substitute the third and first Frenet-Serret formulas into equation (12), producing
Then, applying equations (3) and (5) to the last equation yields the second Frenet-Serret formula. Q.E.D.
[edit] Alternative proof
A different proof applies the chain rule to dot products instead of to cross products. Let us restate the definitions:
These five quantities: the (1) tangent, (2) normal and (3) binormal vector fields and the (4) curvature and (5) torsion scalar fields are collectively known as the Frenet-Serret apparatus of the curve. By these definitions, T and N must be unit vectors, and then B must be a unit vector as well since it is the cross product of unit vectors.
From the definitions of N and κ the first Frenet-Serret formula follows immediately:
To prove the third Frenet-Serret formula, notice that
The last term on the right side is equal to zero and can be dropped: B is a unit vector so its derivative B′ must be perpendicular to B, i.e. . The product in the second term on the right is equal to −τ by the definition of torsion. Now for the dot product in the first term. Due to the chain rule for the dot product, it is known that
but so . Applying the first Frenet-Serret formula, , and the first term also drops out. We are left with the third Frenet-Serret formula:
To prove the second Frenet-Serret formula, notice that
The second term on the right drops out: N is a unit vector so its derivative N′ must be perpendicular to N, thus . From application of the chain rule we know that
therefore
Applying the first and third Frenet-Serret formulas, this last equation reduces to
which is the second Frenet-Serret formula, Q.E.D.
See also: Frenet frame.
[edit] References
- Salas and Hille's Calculus -- One and Several Variables. Seventh Edition. Revised by Garret J. Etgen. John Wiley & Sons, 1995. p. 896.
- Elements of Differential Geometry, by Richard S. Millman and George D. Parker.