French verbs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of the series on: French language

Dialects and History Orthography Reforms Use of the circumflex Phonology Liaison Elision Grammar Verbs Conjugation Verb morphology Articles and determiners Adverbs Pronouns Personal Pronouns

This box: view • talk • edit

French verbs are a complex area of French grammar, with a conjugation scheme that allows for three finite moods (with anywhere from one to five synthetic tenses), three non-finite moods, three voices, and two aspects.

Contents 1 Conjugation 1.1 Classification 2 Moods 3 Tenses and aspects 3.1 Tenses and aspects of the indicative mood 3.2 Tenses and aspects of the subjunctive mood 3.3 Tenses and aspects in other verb forms 4 Temporal auxiliary verbs 5 Past participle agreement 6 References

[edit] Conjugation

Main article: French conjugation

French verbs are conjugated by isolating the stem of the verb and adding an ending. In the first and second conjugation classes, the stem is easily identifiable from the infinitive, and remains essentially constant throughout the paradigm. For example, the stem of parler ("speak") is parl- and the stem of finir ("finish") is fin-. In the third group, the relationship between the infinitive form and the stem is less transparent, and several distinct stems are needed to produce all the forms in the paradigm. For example, the verb boire ("drink") has the stems boi-, boiv-, bu-, and buv-.

The ending depends on the mood, tense, and voice of the verb, as well as on the person and number of its subject. Every conjugation exhibits some degree of syncretism, where the same (homophonous, and possibly also homographic) form is used to realize distinct combinations of grammatical features. This is most noticeable for -er verbs. For instance, the conjugated form parle can be the 1st or 3rd person singular indicative or subjunctive form of parler, or the singular familiar imperative. Furthermore, the 2nd person singular indicative and subjunctive form parles and the 3rd person plural form parlent are pronounced the same way as parle (except in liaison contexts). The prevalence of syncretism in conjugation paradigms is one functional explanation for the fact that French does not allow null subjects, unlike most of the other Romance languages.

[edit] Classification

Aside from être and avoir (considered categories unto themselves), French verbs are traditionally grouped into three conjugation classes (groupes):

• The first conjugation class consists of all verbs with infinitives ending in -er, except for the irregular verb aller; the verbs in this conjugation, which together constitute the great majority of French verbs, are all conjugated similarly, though there are a number of subclasses with minor changes arising from orthographical and phonological considerations.
• The second conjugation class consists of most verbs with infinitives ending in -ir, as well as a few verbs in -ïr; these verbs are all conjugated identically (except for the diæresis mark in -ï-), and reflect the Latin inchoative infix -isc-/-esc- (though the modern French -iss- does not retain any aspectual semantics).
• The third conjugation class consists of all other verbs: aller, a number of verbs in -ir (including all verbs in -oir, which is an etymologically unrelated ending), and all verbs in -re. Nonetheless, this class is very small compared to the other two, though it does contain some of the most common verbs. This class has a few dozen subclasses, often differing substantially; indeed, this class is essentially a catch-all for verbs, besides être and avoir, that do not fit into the first two classes.

[edit] Moods

As with English verbs, French verbs have both non-finite moods (les modes impersonnels), also called verbals, and three finite ones (les modes personnels): an indicative (l'indicatif), an imperative (l'impératif), and a subjunctive (le subjonctif). While the rules that determine the correct mood are quite complex, they are simplified and summarized in the following table:

indicative	used in most independent clauses used in affirmative and negative statements and questions used in dependent clauses that are certainly true used when no other mood applies	« Où êtes-vous ? » ("Where are you?") « Je suis ici. » ("I am here.")
imperative	used in commands and requests only possible with first-person plural and second-person singular and plural subject the subject is implied almost exactly as in English	« Fais tes devoirs ! » ("Do your homework!")
subjunctive	used in many dependent clauses used to express a doubtful, desired, or requested event used to express an event to which the reaction is of most significance used to express a third-person imperative used much more than in English	« Il se peut qu'il vienne demain. » ("It may be that he will come tomorrow.") « J'ai demandé qu'il parte. » ("I asked that he leave.") « Je suis heureux qu'il soit venu. » ("I'm glad that he came.") « Vive le roi ! » ("Long live the king!")

Many linguists consider a fourth mood, the conditional (le conditionnel), which is used in almost exactly the same circumstances as the conditional in English. In French, « Je le ferais si j'avais assez de temps » is "I would do it if I had enough time" in English. Other linguists consider the conditional to be a specific tense within the indicative mood. The two camps do not disagree in the rules for when and how to use the conditional.

[edit] Tenses and aspects

[edit] Tenses and aspects of the indicative mood

The indicative mood has five "simple" (synthetic) tenses: the present (le présent), the simple past (le passé simple), the imperfect (l'imparfait), the future (le futur), and the conditional (le conditionnel). Note that, as discussed above, the conditional can be considered a separate mood completely, rather than a tense of the indicative. The use of the various tenses is described in the following table:

present	used to describe ongoing events in the present sometimes used to describe upcoming events used in a protasis (if-clause) when the apodosis (then-clause) is in the future tense or imperative mode often used in describing historical events much like in English, except that there is no continuous aspect marker	« Le mardi, je joue au tennis. » ("On Tuesdays, I play tennis.") « En ce moment, je joue au tennis. » ("At the moment, I am playing tennis.") « Demain, je joue au tennis avec Marc. » ("Tomorrow, I am playing tennis with Marc.") « Si je joue au tennis avec vous mardi, jouerez-vous aux échecs avec moi mercredi ? » ("If I play tennis with you on Tuesday, will you play chess with me on Wednesday?")
simple past	used to describe past events in a perfective or aorist aspect; that is, with a sense of completion, with a definite beginning and end a literary tense that is very rarely used in spoken language	« Et la lumière fut. » ("And there was light.") « Il naquit en 1930 et mourut en 1998. » ("He was born in 1930 and died in 1998.") « Hier, il plut. » ("Yesterday, it rained.") « Il rangea la salle tandis qu'elle faisait la vaisselle. » ("He cleaned the room while she was washing the dishes.")
imperfect	used to describe past events or situations in an imperfective aspect; that is, ongoing, repetitive, or habitual past events or situations often used in conjunction with the simple or compound past to indicate an event that was ongoing while another took place used in a contrary-to-fact protasis (with the apodosis in the conditional) often analogous to English past continuous ("was doing") or to the construction "used to do"	« Quand j'étais jeune, j'habitais à Paris. » ("When I was young, I lived in Paris.") « Il rangea la salle tandis qu'elle faisait la vaisselle. » ("He cleaned the room while she was washing the dishes.") « Si je le savais, je te le dirais. » ("If I knew [it], I would tell you.")
future	used to describe future events mostly the same as in English, except that it is a simple (one-word) tense in French	« Je le ferai demain. » ("I will do it tomorrow.")
conditional	used in an apodosis when the protasis is contrary to fact (in the imperfect) used to describe a past event from the standpoint of an even-earlier event mostly the same as in English, except that it is a simple (one-word) tense in French	« Si je le savais, je te le dirais. » ("If I knew it, I would tell you.") « Ils dirent que je réussirais. » ("They said that I would succeed.")

Additionally, the indicative has five compound (two-word) tenses, each of which results from applying the perfect aspect (e.g., "have done") to one of the above simple tenses. These tenses are used to indicate events prior to the corresponding simple tenses; for example, « À ce moment-là, il se souvint de ce qu'il avait promis » ("At that moment, he remembered what he had promised"). In addition, except in literature or very formal speeches, the present perfect is used in modern French wherever the simple past would have been used in older or more literary writing. Since this use is much more common than its use as a true present perfect, it is usually called the compound past (le passé composé). Further, where older or more literary French would have used the perfect aspect of the simple past tense (le passé antérieur), modern non-literary French uses the pluperfect (le plus-que-parfait; the perfect aspect of the imperfect tense), or sometimes a new form called the surcomposé (literally, "over-compound"), which re-applies the perfect aspect to the compound past, resulting in a structure like « Je l'ai eu fait » (literally, "I it have had done").

Unlike English or Spanish, French does not mark for a continuous aspect. Thus, "I am doing it" (continuous) and "I do it" (not) both translate to the same sentence in French: « Je le fais. » However, this information is often clear from context; and when not, it can be conveyed using periphrasis; for example, the expression être en train de [faire quelque chose] ("to be in the middle of [doing something]") is often used to convey the sense of a continuous aspect. (For example, "I'm doing it" might be expressed as « Je suis en train de le faire », "I'm in the middle of doing it.") In the case of the past tense, neither the simple nor the compound past tense is ever used with a continuous sense; therefore, the imperfect often indicates a continuous sense (though it does have other uses, as discussed above).

Similarly to English, the verb aller (to go) can be used as an auxiliary verb to create a near-future tense (le futur proche). Whereas English uses the continuous aspect (to be going), French uses the simple present tense; for example, the English sentence "I'm going to do it tomorrow" would in French be « Je vais le faire demain » (literally, "I go it to do tomorrow"). As in English, this form can generally be replaced by the present or future tense: "I'm doing it tomorrow", "I'll do it tomorrow", « Je le fais demain », « Je le ferai demain ».

[edit] Tenses and aspects of the subjunctive mood

The subjunctive mood has only two simple tenses: a present (le présent du subjonctif) and an imperfect (l'imparfait du subjonctif). Of these, only the present is used nowadays; like the simple past indicative, the imperfect subjunctive is only found in older and more literary works. When both tenses are used, there is no difference in meaning between the two; the present is used in subordinate clauses whose main clauses are in a present or future tense, as well as in the few main clauses that use the subjunctive, and the imperfect is used in subordinate clauses whose main clauses are in a past tense (other than present perfect). Except in literature and very formal speeches, modern French uses the present subjunctive wherever an older or more literary work would use the imperfect.

As with the indicative, the subjunctive also has one compound tense for each simple tense. The difference between the present perfect subjunctive (le passé du subjonctif) and the pluperfect subjunctive (le plus-que-parfait du subjonctif) is analogous to the difference between the present subjunctive and imperfect subjunctive; of the two, only the present perfect subjunctive is found in modern French.

[edit] Tenses and aspects in other verb forms

The tenses and aspects of other verb forms are mostly as in English, except for the lack of a continuous aspect marking:

• The imperative only has a present tense, with a rarely-used perfect aspect: "fais-le" means "do it," while "aie-le fait" means "have done it."
• The infinitive has a present tense, with a perfect aspect: "faire" means "to do," while "avoir fait" means "to have done."
• There is a present participle, with a perfect aspect: "faisant" means "doing," while "ayant fait" means "having done." As noted above, this participle is not used in forming a continuous aspect. Further, it cannot be used as a noun, in the way that present participles in English have the same form as gerunds; the only noun verbal is the infinitive.
• There is a separate past participle: "fait" means "done." As in English, it can be used in the passive voice, in the perfect aspect, or on its own as an adjective. The past participle has no perfect aspect, except arguably in the special surcomposée tense described above.
• There is a gérondif ("gerundive," but different from the Latin gerundive), formed with the clitic en and the present participle: "en faisant" means "by doing" or "while doing." (It is analogous to the English "in doing," but in English, since "doing" can act as a noun, "in doing" is taken as a prepositional phrase rather than as a separate verb form. That interpretation is not available for "en faisant.") Similarly, "en ayant fait" means "by having done."

[edit] Temporal auxiliary verbs

In French, all compound tenses are formed with an auxiliary verb (either être "to be" or avoir "to have"). Most verbs use avoir as their auxiliary verb. The exceptions are all reflexive verbs and a number of verbs of motion or change of state, including some of the most frequently used verbs of the language:

• aller — to go
• arriver — to arrive
• décéder — to pass away
• descendre¹ — to go down
• devenir — to become
• entrer¹ — to enter
• monter¹ — to climb/go up
• mourir — to die
• naître — to be born
• partir — to leave or part
• passer¹ — to pass by
• rester — to stay
• retourner¹ — to send back/to return
• sortir¹ — to go out
• tomber¹ — to fall
• venir — to come

Verbs that are derived from these by prefixation may continue to select être, but this is not always the case. For example:

• (with être)
  • derived from venir: advenir, intervenir, parvenir, provenir, survenir
  • prefix re-: redevenir, remonter¹, renaître, rentrer¹, ressortir¹, revenir, etc.
• (with 'avoir')
  • derived from venir: circonvenir, contrevenir, convenir, prévenir, subvenir
  • transitive verbs: démonter, surmonter, remonter (trans.), dépasser, outrepasser, repasser (trans.), surpasser, etc.

(The verbs marked with "¹" above combine with être in their intransitive uses, and avoir when used transitively.)

A small number of verbs, including some already mentioned above, can in fact be found with either auxiliary (croître, monter, descendre, convenir, paraître, apparaître, descendre, trépasser). There may be a subtle change of meaning depending on the auxiliary chosen, and one auxiliary is usually more "literary" or "old-fashioned" than the other.

The distinction between the two auxiliary verbs is important for the correct formation of the compound tenses and is also essential to the agreement of the past participle.

[edit] Past participle agreement

The past participle is used in three ways in French: as an adjective, in the passive construction, and to form the compound tenses. When it is used as an adjective, it follows all the regular adjective agreement rules. In passive constructions, it always agrees with the passive subject.

In compound tenses, more complicated agreement rules apply.

A. The auxiliary verb is avoir.

1. If there is no direct object (the verb is intransitive) or the direct object appears after the past participle, then the past participle does not agree (i.e., it takes the default masculine singular form).
   • (intransitive) Elles ont dormi.
   • (direct object after verb) Claire a vu deux baleines.
2. If there is a direct object, but it does not appear after the past participle, then the participle must agree with it. Three cases:
   • (pronoun before the auxiliary) Il y avait deux baleines. Claire les a vues.
   • (clause-initial wh-question element) Quelles baleines Claire a-t-elle vues ?
   • (relative clause introduced by que) les deux baleines que Claire a vues

B. The auxiliary is être, and the verb is not reflexive. The past participle agrees with the subject:

Elles sont arrivées

C. The auxiliary is être and the verb is reflexive. The agreement rules are in fact the same as those for structures with avoir in A, keeping in mind that the reflexive pronoun corresponds either to the direct object or the indirect object of the verb.

1. There is no direct object, or the direct object appears after the past participle → no agreement. In these cases the reflexive pronoun expresses the indirect object.
   • (no direct object) Elles se sont succédé. Nous nous sommes parlé.
   • (direct object after verb) Elles se sont posé des questions.
2. There is a direct object, but it does not appear after the past participle. → The past participle agrees with this object.

   The first three cases are the same as in A.2 above (the reflexive pronoun is the indirect object).

   • (direct object pronoun) J'ai fait une tarte. Les enfants se la sont partageé.
   • (wh-question) Quelle tarte se sont-ils partagée ?
   • (que relative) la tarte que les enfants se sont partagée

   The reflexive pronoun can itself be the direct object, in which case the participle agrees with it (and therefore with the subject). This also includes "inherently reflexive" verbs, for which the reflexive pronoun cannot be interpreted semantically as an object (direct or indirect) of the verb.

   • (ordinary reflexive) Elles se sont suivies. Nous nous sommes salués.
   • (inherently reflexive) Ils se sont moqués de moi. Nous nous sommes souvenus de l'événement.
     (exception: Elles se sont ri du danger.)

[edit] References

• L. Tasmowski and S. Reinheimer. "Variations dans le radical du verbe roman". In D. Godard (ed), Les langues romanes; Problèmes de la phrase simple. Paris, CNRS Editions, 2003.