Talk:Frank R. Wallace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sigma Xi
Bi deleted note that Wallace is a member of Sigma Xi. I contacted Sigma Xi, and they said he is an "active member." Anyone can contact them if they need to verify that. What a ridiculous deletion from Bi, anyway --who is going to lie about something so easily verified? RJII 06:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I've removed an external link
...because it didn't seem relevant at all—or am I missing something? RJII added it, but it looks like he's been blocked, so I can't ask him. (Here's the latest diff) --zenohockey 04:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm back. That site used to have some information on the death and funeral but it's been archived. No need for the link anymore. RJII 04:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] This page is possibly inaccurate
This page states that Frank R Wallace is dead. The date it states he died is prior to the date the Better Business Bureau states he appeared before them to negotiate Neo-Tech's membership with them.
Report on BBB.org's website for Neo-Tech Publishing:
http://worf.usshurdman.com/~vegas/commonreport.html?compid=48788
Scroll to bottom section with notes regarding activity and events.
I would suggest that someone verify that the man on this page is indeed deceased. Business documentation would suggest otherwise.
If it would be of assistance to anyone this is the information I have collected:
Name: Wallace Ward (unknown middle name/initial)
AKA: Frank R. Wallace
Birth: 10 Sep 1932
Alleged Death: 26 Jan 2006
Place of Death: Henderson, Nevada, USA
SSN: 123-24-9841
Last Residence: Henderson, Nevada, USA 89074
Department of Vital Records for Henderson, NV: +1 (702) 759-1011
Death Certificate verification is done between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM MST.
I have not yet been able to call them during this one hour window to verify. If someone is able to verify this information please post your results on this talk page.
Thanks,
- I suspect that the Wallace Ward mentioned by the BBB is actually his son, Wallace Ward Jr. But someone should really check up on this. Bi 16:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Old Neo-Tech philosophy talk page
Just for the record: part of the article was merged from "Neo-Tech (philosophy)", and here's the talk page for the old article. Bi
- Actually, it wasn't merged at all. It was redirected to here. Here is the hidden Neo-Tech article: [1] It was redirected after a vote based on ignorance and manipulation. The article should be restored. JoeMystical 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ignorance and manipulation? Do you have any solid evidence to back up that claim? Bi 11:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Linkspam from Nathan Shaw
I zapped two extra links which were added in the latest edit, because
- the links give undue weight to Neo-Tech's viewpoint, and besides are added in violation of conflict of interest guidelines;
- the links are described in obviously non-neutral language;
- and finally, Nathan Shaw, the editor who added the links, is a known spammer, which makes it hard to believe that the edit was done out of good faith.
-- Bi 19:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)