Talk:Fort Knox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Louisville, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Louisville on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Related task forces... United States military history task force World War I task force World War II task force

[edit] Security reputation, gold, etc

Isnt Fort Knox the place where all gold is stored? Isnt Fort Knox very well known for being high-security and well guarded or something?

Fort Knox Bullion Depository - it's already covered. ---J.Smith 01:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I, too, did not think of going to the Fort Knox Bullion Depository to find more about the high-security. I originally came in search of it, and would have left empty-handed if I had not come to the talk page. Perhaps a small note regarding the influence of the name "Fort Knox", and another link to the Fort Knox Bullion Depository? Kareeser|^Talk! 23:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

The current full name for the installation is United States Army Armor Center & Fort Knox, and United States Army Armor School.

SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 00:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lazy cut and paste jobs

I'm not allowing lazy cut and paste jobs into this article. Period. Do your own writing! Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 06:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Dumping a bunch of unwikified text here and expecting others to clean it up is unacceptable, no matter the source. Also, even if public domain text is usable, it must be *factored* into the existing article, something that was not done. Also, the existing content (that many people had worked on) was removed in the process. I don't see a serious effort here to create a good article, and until it becomes serious, I'm fighting it. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 14:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)