Talk:Ford Mustang Mach 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The current article (3/9/06) is all wrong and filled with mis-information! --SPM1 05:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Agreed, I will see what I can do with this article when I get time. If someone jumps on it before me, so be it... Feedloadr 16:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Feedloadr
Contents |
[edit] Verification Please
I will be cutting some things out from the article I have doubts on and want verification before it is put back in the Article. Heck I may leave it in the article for a bit before removal.
1. "In fact, it broke the world speed record for Fastest Production Car in 1969."
Feedloadr 13:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Also
I would like someone to condense the 2003/04 Mach 1 section to pertain more to MACH 1. Currently it has 2 long paragraphs talking about mustang and SVT and one long and one short paragraph about the Mach 1. Doesn't make sense to have more info about the mustang when there is one on just Mustang, when this focuses on the Mach 1 model.
Feedloadr 13:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] and
One last note, most the work on this topic I have done after getting off work and after work my mind isn't exactly sharp. Please forgive typos and such, hopefully I will check back over it later when I am more awake and refreshed an fix my errors.
I need to reference most of what I have on here, I do intend on doing such, just haven't got there yet. Bite me if you don't like it. Nobody else jumped into fixxing this clusterf**k of an article, so I did, and I will work at my pace gosh darnet. If you do need to know, hit me up.
I am rambling now, I worked all night...I'm out. Feedloadr 13:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Breakdown of Info
This is an afterthought after posting my above post. I forgot to mention it. I was wondering if anyone thought it would be better to instead of have a Popular engines at the end, have a subtopic at the end of the topic/section of engine info. Or perhaps instead have a chart with CI, HP, tq, barrel and year for the engines... either Feedback on the first option or just doing the second one would be great....Thanks... Feedloadr 13:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Engine Size incorrect
The Engine sizes listed were wrong in one regard. A 4.6L SOHC engine was in the list. This was never in production for the Mach 1. I own a 2003 Mach 1 and the engine is a 4.6L DOHC, with 4 valve per cylinder. This is a design very similar to the Cobra Engine, however it is naturally aspirated. I have changed the SOHC comment at the bottom to DOHC and left it at that.
This is factually correct now.
