User talk:Firefoxman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| 1 2 3 4 |
| 5 6 7 8 |
Contents |
[edit] Signpost updated for December 4th.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Mario Portal
Sure you can help! —The Great Llamamoo? 21:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Anything, really. Updating the selected article, updating news and categories, and adding more info do "Did you know" are some suggestions. —The Great Llamamoo? 00:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Keep per nom
You just voted "keep per nom" on an AfD here. AfD nominations are there to get articles deleted, not kept. You might want to look at that nomination again. JDtalk 20:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I was using a phrase without understanding it.The Fox Man of Fire 20:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Double "voting"
I removed your second "delete" from Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MiniEgo. It's not a good idea to "vote" twice on the same AfD. yandman 08:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I must have forgot that I had already voted on that AfD. Thanks for catching my mistake! FirefoxMan 12:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pandagon vote
Can you please explain your vote on this AfD page? It seem that the blog clearly satisfies the second criteria for the requirement. What more is needed to satisfy the requirement? IrnBru001 17:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- The Weblog Awards and the Take Back America conference do not get articles, and they are sited as awards. Awards must be notable to be counted. Being in the top ten of a major magazine is not enough, unless it was above #3. FirefoxMan 20:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- In your opinion. I believe both are important enough to warrant their own articles. I see no reason to think that the top ten of a major magazine isn't enough. Your claim in not supported in the guideline. The article mets the current guideline, you are now trying to change the guideline. The article needs to be judged against the guideline AS IT IS WRITTEN. If you want to change that guideline then discuss it on that pages talk page. IrnBru001 20:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I do not consider it an award to be in a list, and AfDs are supposed to be ask users for their input and opinion on the noteworthiness of a article. FirefoxMan 23:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- No thats the problem, your supposed to judge it against the existing standard. That's what your failing to do. IrnBru001 23:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I do not consider it an award to be in a list, and AfDs are supposed to be ask users for their input and opinion on the noteworthiness of a article. FirefoxMan 23:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- In your opinion. I believe both are important enough to warrant their own articles. I see no reason to think that the top ten of a major magazine isn't enough. Your claim in not supported in the guideline. The article mets the current guideline, you are now trying to change the guideline. The article needs to be judged against the guideline AS IT IS WRITTEN. If you want to change that guideline then discuss it on that pages talk page. IrnBru001 20:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] More doubles
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pandagon. And there you voted against yourself... yandman 17:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I must remember to check more carefully. Thanks again. FirefoxMan 19:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
