Talk:Final Fantasy (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Final Fantasy (video game) article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

Final Fantasy (video game) (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

Final Fantasy (video game) is part of the Final Fantasy titles series, a featured topic, which means it has been identified as part of one of the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.

	This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article is on a subject of high priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
	This is a selected article of WikiProject Computer and video games.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: X-Men vs. Street Fighter Expand: New CVG Articles, List of Nintendo trademarks, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: Super Transformation, Turok: Dinosaur Hunter, Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games, Yoshi, Black Isle's Torn, Rise of Nations, Kirby (Nintendo), PlayStation 3, Mega Man Zero 4, Luigi Cleanup: Shiny Entertainment, Age of Mythology, Serious Sam II, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Ted Price, Betrayal at Krondor, Little Fighter 2 Merge: Current Events (Update needed!) / Deletions / Essential articles / Workshop / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

This article is part of WikiProject Square Enix, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Square Enix related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This article or template is part of WikiProject Final Fantasy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Final Fantasy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

	To-do list for Final Fantasy (video game):	edit - history - watch - refresh
	GET TO FA STATUS check reference quality, replace where unreliable, fill in where references are needed. More information on the games development and soundtrack w/ primary source references. copyedit fair use rationales and sources images 2-11 image use, image captions, amano art, FMV? merge some soundtrack info quote from game story script, game manual in gameplay and story sections

Final Fantasy (video game) has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Contents 1 Which was released first?! 2 Weird screen shot 3 Secret Location 4 Recent info added 5 Vandalism 6 Sources

[edit] Which was released first?!

Was it the MSX2 version or NES, I remember reading on the Square Co. page that the MSX2 was first but on here it's saying the NES version was first, it makes more sense that the MSX2 version was first since Square had a history of making games for PC, not to mention that the NES version was more poupular so they assumed that one was first...--FlareNUKE 23:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

EDIT: Oh wait, sorry forget this...

Shall I throw up a screenshot from the American NES version? For English speaking readers, it's probably the first version they saw, and the first one on the North American continent anyway; it seems conspicuous in its absence. 132.162.213.109 16:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Weird screen shot

What's the deal with the weird screenshot of the light warriors fighting the Lich? Unless it's possible in the Japanese version for a pc to show its death graphic while still having HP, this seems like a doctored or bugged image. Also odd: the Knight has, at most, slightly more than 100 hp, since he isn't bending over. Since this is presumably a screen shot from the final dungeon of the game, it seems rather odd for the warrior to such a freakishly small amount of hp. Can anyone explain what's up with the image? If not, I'm just going to replace it.

Agreed, that shot shouldn't be possible, it must have been either doctored or played by someone using cheat devices. Replacement is recommended. LifeMega 21:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Also, we might want to address a previous comment and see about replacing it with an English screenshot. – Seancdaug 07:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Secret Location

There is a level-up location that is available extremely early in the game. This area is accessible once you can enter Pravokia. You can even access it before beating the pirates, although you might need their ship into Elfland in order to buy at least one Silver sword and one Lv 3-4 spell.

Should we include the following in the article?

Recommended equipment: Definitely the silver Sword for everyone that can wield it, one CABIN or TENT, FIR2, FAST, and CUR2 and the best armor you can afford. HARM2 is optional since it will not be 100% effective.

Once you have all this, head back to Pravokia. From there, on the world map, go a little south to find the path that goes inmediately east. After about 40secs walking, you will come accross a white mountain right in the middle of the land, with the option of going north and south-east i believe. Go north. All the way. After about 1-2 minutes of walking you will reach the very northernmost tip of the continent, it looks like a hand pointing north, displaying the "1" sign. The finger is two tiles wide. You will know you are in the right place because 2-4 tiles north you can see the southernmost part of the north continent.

Now, you will notice there is a 2 x 2 forest in the very tip of the continent (hand). Walk into it. Once you draw a fight, here is what you can expect:

1-3 ZOMBULLS (likely 2, about 30% of the time) 1-4 GIANTS (likely 3, about 45% of the time) 5-8 FROSTWOLF (likely 5, about 20% of the time) 1 TREX (1, about 5% of the time)

Depending on your level, you might want to only fight ZOMBULLS to begin with. They are by far the most profitable option, and the weakest, and you can harm them with your mages (They are weak against HARM and FIR2). The FROSTWOLF will inflict heavy damage to the party with their frost spell, so run inmediately. GIANTS & REX will be very tough, since at the start they can kill mages with one blow.

Once the fight is over, you will probably neef to head back to the INN in Pravokia. Use the tent/cabin you bought for a quick fix, and you only have 1-2 party members surviving, watch out for the ghouls on the way back that have paralyzing hits. While they don't do much damage, the fact that you are down in numbers and they come in packs, can make a suprised battle your last one; since they can paralyze your surviving group in one round. Dragonlord kfb 18:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a strategy guide. Unless this had some other significance, I don't recommend including it in the article. ~ Hibana 22:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recent info added

I do not think any of the recently added information is particularly useful, especially in light of going toward a Featured Status. Most of the added information will have to get trimmed away as it is not well written, and there are no references or newly added information among it. Regular contributor thoughts? Judgesurreal777 02:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Agree; I dislike the new inclusions, as well. — Deckiller 02:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I think we should revert or remove it, I'm sorry to say, as I dont like removing peoples contributions, but it is not helpful. Judgesurreal777 02:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind reverting it. I tried to get some responses from the new edits on the WPFF page, but nobody even bothered to respond until now. — Deckiller 03:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

What I really want is a great article, not to pump up my ego, so do as you see fit. I disagree with your assessment; I think my version is a distinct improvement on the earlier version. For a seasoned RPG player it does not convey much more information, but for someone who has zero or limited experience with RPGs it does. If I were to try again I might not target it quite so low, though. I have one request, that you not revert but instead rewrite from scratch. My prose may not be brilliant, but neither was the old prose. If you rewrite chances are you'll do better.

One other thing: This article is poorly organized. It should probably be structured something like this:

• Development (which would be limited to the NES version; since we're the English language wikipedia, we should include the English localization)
• Story
• Gameplay
• Impact
• Ports and updated versions

As it is now the article jumps into the gameplay without first explaining why the game is interesting, and I think that's a mistake. 141.211.120.199 03:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Your attitude is admirable, you should get a user name and start contributing with use Final Fantasy fans :) Judgesurreal777 23:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

If you check the history, we recently had some vandalism from "69.114.140.217" I replaced his vandalism (Calling us all nerds) with the last good version of the site. I think we should get a final, verifyable version of the info, and get this topic locked.

Caikun 23:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what you mean, as an article like this will always need to be improved or updated occassionally. Having to revert one random instance of vandalism shouldn't really warrant page protection, as it's an ongoing, inevitable fight. ~ Hibana 00:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

Seems there are a whole lot of 'citation needed' tags here, and I'm wondering why. Wouldn't the games themselves (eg. the MSX2 version) be considered the source? DanPMK 00:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)