Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on
Cults

Cult
Cults and governments
Cult of personality
Cult suicide
Destructive cult
In literature, popular culture
Political cult
Cult apologist

Individuals
Cult and NRM researchers

Organizations
CESNUR
Cult Awareness Network
Cult-watching group
Fight Against Coercive Tactics
FREECOG
Int'l Cultic Studies Assoc.
MIVILUDES
Reachout Trust

Opposition
Anti-Cult Movement
Christian countercult movement
Opposition to cults and NRMs

Theories / Methodologies
Brainwashing
Cult checklists
Deprogramming
Exit counseling
Mind control
Post-cult trauma

Related
Apostasy
Bigotry
Charismatic authority
Groupthink
Occult
Religious intolerance
True-believer syndrome
Witch hunt
Freedom of religion
Universal Declaration Human Rights
Freedom of Expression
Religious freedom by country

This box: view  talk  edit

The Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network, or FACTNet, is a Colorado-based organization committed to educating and facilitating communication about destructive mind control. Coercive tactics, or "coercive psychological systems", are defined on their website as "unethical mind control such as brainwashing, thought reform, destructive persuasion and coercive persuasion". While this appears to cover a massive array of issues, in practice FACTNet's primary dedication is to the exposure and disruption of cult activity. Recognizing this and desiring a more universally applicable appearance, FACTNet expanded its mission statement in 2002 to include "mind control and unethical influence as found in governments, corporations, social organizations, advertising/marketing, political organizations, the military and family groups".

Contents

[edit] Mission

FACTNet describes its mission as "protecting freedom of mind", and cites as its guiding precept the United Nations' Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, specifically its first article which includes the statement that "no one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his ability to have a religion or belief of his choice". This is described more palatably, if less objectively, in the slogan which is featured prominently on their website:

"We are to destructive cults, fundamentalism, mind control, and mental coercion/torture what Amnesty International is to physical torture".

[edit] Execution

FACTNet uses its website as a hub for discussion and communication, facilitating connections between cult victims, former cult members, and professional counselors. FACTNet is often used to refer specifically to the extensive forums and discussion boards found there. The organization also uses the internet to distribute materials on mind control and destructive cults electronically, and to educate people on the recognition and prevention of harmful mind control. The main page features timely news posts highlighting cults and anti-cult activity in the news and media.

[edit] In the news

In 1995 FACTNet was featured in the news due to a lawsuit regarding the seizure of FACTNet servers and files by the Religious Technology Center (RTC), a sub-organization of the Church of Scientology created to oversee the protection of its trademarks and copyrights. In August 1995 RTC lawyers went to a Denver judge alleging copyright infringement and illegal use of scientology documents by FACTNet, a vocal critic of the religion's practices. It was later revealed that the lawyers failed to inform the judge that FACTNet was a non-profit electronic library and archive. Possibly due to this omission, the judge was convinced to grant a search and seizure order for all of FACTNet's electronic resources.

A raid of two directors' homes was conducted on August 21, 1995 by two U.S. marshals and six RTC representatives, with the actual search for incriminating documents conducted by the RTC alone. Witnesses of the searches testified that the marshals allowed the RTC representatives to go far beyond the scope of the order in their search for information. The marshals also failed to search the representatives before or after the search, making it possible for them to carry off disks and other documents containing critical information. FACTNet immediately accused the Church of Scientology of attempting to silence their voice by stealing and contaminating information vital to their continued attacks and lawsuits against the Church.

FACTNet filed a lawsuit, and on September 14, 1995 a Federal judge ruled the seizure illegal because it violated FACTNet's right to free speech on the internet, and ordered the RTC to return all computers and files that were seized. Nevertheless, FACTNet claimed to have incurred irreparable damage, as the secrecy of its documents had been violated by the RTC.

If indeed the RTC had intended to silence FACTNet, their actions had the opposite effect. The raid gave the FACTNet community a rallying point and a new example of intimidation and harassment by the Church of Scientology to support their critical views. 11 years later, the raid is still well-documented and archived on their website, including a detailed analysis of what it was "really all about".

FACTNet has maintained a relatively low news profile since 1995, occasionally cited for speaking out against topics they consider important. The 2000 film Battlefield Earth starring John Travolta stirred up controversy because it was based on a book by L. R. Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology, and Travolta was a well-known church member. Even more recently, FACTNet spoke out in support of an episode of the TV show South Park that satirized scientology and motivated the resignation of South Park voice-actor Isaac Hayes, an outspoken scientologist.

[edit] Controversy and criticism

The FACTNet forums are inevitably host not only to threads regarding cults widely accepted as destructive but also criticism of mainstream religions. Casual viewers of the forums are bound to find content that they disagree with or are offended by. While this is nothing new and is an unavoidable product of anonymous online communities, it has nonetheless generated some controversy concerning what the organization really stands for. Such criticisms seldom go far, as FACTNet is founded upon the deliberately broad ideal of "freedom of mind". Thus its directors would argue that the organization is dedicated to allowing people to think whatever they want, not to a particular religion.

[edit] Links

FACTNet Homepage