Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Emperor Gum Moth Caterpillar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] An Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar in its 5th development stage

1. An Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar in its 5th development stage
Enlarge
1. An Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar in its 5th development stage
2. The Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar feeding on a eucalyptus leafa Wikipedia:Featured picture
Enlarge
2. The Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar feeding on a eucalyptus leaf
a Wikipedia:Featured picture
3. The underside of an Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar
Enlarge
3. The underside of an Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar
4. The Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar at the 4th development stage
Enlarge
4. The Emperor Gum Moth caterpillar at the 4th development stage

The Emperor Gum Moth Caterpillar is very beautifull, and I think at least one of these images have done it justice.

  • Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 07:24, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Some of them are hard to see because of the background color, but I'd be happy to support the top right (feeding one). Mgm|(talk) 09:08, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • I support picture number one (top left)--ZayZayEM 07:16, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose all: (1) shows only part of the animal, (2) has half of the animal out of focus, (3) is only the underside, and (4) has the light from the back. Good pics, but short of feature material. Sorry. Also, for future nominations, maybe its better to put only one image up for a vote, and not all of a series. -- Chris 73 Talk 00:18, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • I will support the top right picture. I echo Mgm's concerns about the background distractions in all others but do NOT oppose them. I am slightly concerned about the focus issue in the top right, but I'm willing to give some artistic license to it. It's a nice picture (set of pictures, actually). Good work. -SocratesJedi | Talk 01:07, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Doesn't the out of focus back part help show depth to the picture? Mgm|(talk) 09:58, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. They're all good shots, but I prefer #2. - Jpo 23:57, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support any except #3. --Aqua 09:29, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support for the complete works. --Thomas G Graf 19:31, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Promote #2 (+7/-1/0 overall). I think number 2 has the most support BrokenSegue 20:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)