Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Indian Railways

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Indian Railways

Last week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. I learnt a lot about the Indian Railways while writing this article. Thanks to all the people who helped. The first of my two (maybe three) part series... =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:24, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

• Support Thanks to Nichalp for leading the charge on this one. What a metamorphosis! I've helped out with copyedits and link fixes, but not much more. slambo 18:37, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Support, looks quite comprehensive to me, not rather Railways of India? Phoenix2 18:49, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I now see that Indian Railways is a company, not an overview of railways in India. Phoenix2 18:55, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Support on condition someone goes through and removes the annoying definite articles (thes) before Indian Railways. Dunc|☺ 19:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Done =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:25, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Support (it is also worth mentioning that the article was on WP:PR for a short while and was WP:COTW ages ago). But, as discussed in Talk:Indian Railways, should the chunk of the article currently at Rail transport in India be incorporated here too? -- ALoan (Talk) 23:17, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

By merging the two sections the article becomes too long. In this way we can move the technical details to another page and expand that further. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:08, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

The discussion on the talk page was to split the article into Indian Railways and Rail transport in India, not to merge them. slambo 10:47, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

And then there was some about putting them back together again! -- ALoan (Talk) 11:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Support a fascinating article that covers its vast subject admirably well. Lisiate 03:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Support Well written article with plenty of pictures and very good prose. Sam Vimes 11:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Support A well written article and I learnt a lot about Indian Railways. -- Sundar (talk • contribs) 03:43, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Support, looks good, it appears that the points I mentioned in PR have been addressed. JYolkowski // talk 20:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)