Talk:Features of Mozilla Firefox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
could the 2nd paragraph of #themes be moved to the history article? --Quiddity 09:24, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
yep
Contents |
[edit] Security
I don't know if all of the security section belongs in here. It seems to drift away from talking about the features of Firefox.--Nonpareility 19:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The overall state of this article
A few things I think need to happen
- Make it less marketing-y. Talk about (notable!) criticisms made about certain features. For example, I added a cited criticism that extensions are harder to use than if the functionality was there by default.
- We need to figure out which features are notable enough to mention, which are notable enough to have their own section, etc.
- Include references in all claims.
- Update the article. The "new" features in 1.5 aren't so new anymore.
--Nonpareility 17:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vulnerability history
Why does this section keep getting removed? It's incredibly important in determining how good Firefox's security is. It belongs right in the security section, not in the history article. (Perhaps it's poorly named, though. "Vulnerability statistics" might be better).--Nonpareility 02:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mozilla vs. Seamonkey
I just corrected the article to state that Firefox borrowed the tabbed browsing concept from the Multizilla extension for Mozilla. The article stated previously that tabbed browsing had come from the Multizilla extension for Seamonkey. This cannot have happened because the original Mozilla suite supported tabbed browsing before either Firefox or Seamonkey branched from it. Quanticle 21:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
