Features of Mozilla Firefox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The features of Mozilla Firefox distinguish it from other web browsers such as Internet Explorer, and are subject to both rave reviews and harsh criticisms. It lacks many features found in other browsers, in an effort to combat interface bloat and to allow the browser to be shipped as a small, pared-down core easily customizable to meet individual users' needs. Instead of providing all features in the standard distribution, Firefox relies on the extension system to allow users to modify the browser according to their requirements.
Contents |
[edit] Tabbed browsing
Firefox supports tabbed browsing, which allows users to open multiple pages in the same window. This feature was carried over from the Mozilla Application Suite, which in turn had borrowed the feature from the popular MultiZilla extension for Mozilla. Until version 1.0, Firefox did not support automatic single window mode, in which all links that would normally open in a new window were instead opened in a new tab. This feature was introduced in 1.0 after complaints from users migrating from other browsers such as Opera, Avant Browser or Maxthon. However, there were a number of problems with this policy, and as a result it has been disabled by default. Before 1.0, most users who preferred single window mode used extensions such as Tabbrowser Preferences or Tabbrowser Extensions to solve their quandary.
Firefox also permits the "homepage" to be a list of URLs delimited with vertical bars (|), which are automatically opened in separate tabs, rather than a single page. This can be a mixed blessing, since clicking the home page opens another set of tabs, instead of resetting the current set (though the proper way to solve this isn't entirely clear), and since it is slightly more difficult to open a browser quickly for a single web page retrieval when this is necessary.
[edit] Version 2.0
Version 2.0 makes major changes in the default tabs: each tab has an added X-button for closing that tab, and the fixed X-button at the right end of the tab bar for closing the current tab has been removed. The previous default tab configuration can be restored by using about:config to set browser.tabs.closeButtons to 3:[9]
- 0 ~ Display a close button on the active tab only
- 1 ~ Display a close button on each tab (default)
- 2 ~ Don’t display any close buttons
- 3 ~ Display a single close button at the end of the tab bar (Firefox 1.x behavior)
[edit] Pop-up blocking
Firefox also includes integrated customizable pop-up blocking. Firefox was given this feature early in beta development, and it was a major comparative selling point of the browser until Internet Explorer gained the capability in the Windows XP Service Pack 2 beta. This blocks pop-ups from all web sites by default, but can be configured to allow individual sites to show pop-ups. It can also be turned off entirely to allow pop-ups from all sites. Firefox's pop-up blocking can be inconvenient at times — it prevents JavaScript-based links opening a new window while a page is loading unless the site is added to a "safe list" found in the options menu.
In many cases it is possible to view the pop-up's URL by clicking the dialogue that appears when one is blocked. This makes it easier to decide if the pop-up should be displayed.
[edit] Download manager
An integrated customizable download manager is also included. Downloads can be opened automatically depending on the file type, or saved directly to disk. By default, Firefox downloads all files to a user's desktop on Windows or to the user's home directory on Linux, but it can be configured to prompt for a specific download location. The download manager currently does not support cross-session resuming (stopping a download and resuming it after closing the browser). Another issue with the download manager is that it fails to close if small files or files already in the cache are downloaded. One advantage of the Firefox download manager is that the user can view the full source URL and destination path of the file being downloaded via the Properties box; Internet Explorer only shows the file name and source domain name.
When the download manager was first introduced around version 0.8, there was an uproar among users who preferred the old style of individual windows for downloads, akin to that used by Internet Explorer. Initially there was a great demand for an extension to address the issue but this desire quickly diminished.
[edit] Live Bookmarks
Powered by RSS or Atom feeds, "Live Bookmarks", another feature of Firefox, allow users to dynamically monitor changes to their favorite news sources. When this feature was first introduced in version 1.0 PR, there were a few worries that Firefox was beginning to include non-essential features and that it was beginning to bloat the browser much like the Mozilla Suite. However, these worries have largely abated.
Live Bookmarks have surprised many users with their simplicity. Instead of treating RSS-feeds as HTML pages like most news aggregators do, they are treated as bookmarks that are updated in real-time with a link to the appropriate source.
[edit] Add-ons
There are 3 types of add-ons in Firefox: extensions (for additional browser functionality), themes (modified browser appearance), and plugins (to view additional web content). Firefox add-ons may be obtained from the official Mozilla Add-ons web site or from other sources.
[edit] Extensions
- See also: Firefox Extension system and List of Firefox extensions
Firefox users can add features and change functionality in Firefox by installing extensions. Extension functionality is varied; among the most popular are those enabling mouse gestures, those that block advertisements, and those that enhance tabbed browsing.[citation needed]
Features that the Firefox developers believed would be used by a small number of its users have not been included in Firefox and left to be implemented as extensions.[1] Many Mozilla Suite features, such as IRC chat (ChatZilla) and calendar have been recreated as Firefox extensions.[citation needed] Extensions are also often a testing ground for features that are eventually returned to the main codebase.[citation needed] For example, MultiZilla was an extension that provided tabbed browsing when Mozilla lacked that feature.[citation needed]
While extensions provide a high level of customizability, PC World notes the difficulty a casual user would have in finding and installing extensions as compared to their features being available by default.[2]
Most extensions are not created or supported by Mozilla. As extensions have the same rights to the user's system as Firefox itself, it's possible to create malicious extensions.[3] Mozilla provides a repository of extensions that have been reviewed by volunteers to not contain malware.[citation needed] Since extensions are mostly created by third parties, they do not necessarily go through the same level of testing as official Mozilla products, and they may have bugs or vulnerabilities.[4] The extension system also make it easier for malware that entered the user's computer in another manner to affect Firefox.[citation needed]
[edit] Themes
Firefox also supports a variety of themes/skins for changing its appearance. Themes are simply packages of CSS and image files. Many themes can be downloaded from the Mozilla Update web site.
The change of default theme from Qute to Winstripe in Firefox 0.9 was subject to vocal debate. The Winstripe theme was created by heavily modifying Pinstripe, a theme designed with Mac OS X in mind. Prior to that, Firefox and its predecessors had used the Qute theme, designed by Arvid Axelsson. Due to licensing issues, the theme was prevented from being released under the Mozilla Public License. Axelsson was upset about being notified about the theme change only a few days before it took place, and posted the transcript of his dialogue with Ben Goodger, who had informed him of the change, on the MozillaZine forums, breaking the news before it was formally announced. Although many people criticized the new theme when it was rolled out, eventually the tension subsided. Axelsson continues to produce Qute privately. Axelsson still makes Mozilla Thunderbird's default theme.
[edit] Plugins
Firefox supports plugins based on Netscape Plugin Application Program Interface (NPAPI), i.e. Netscape-style plugins. As a side note, Opera and Internet Explorer 3.0 to 5.0 also support NPAPI.
On June 30, 2004, the Mozilla Foundation, in partnership with Adobe, Apple, Macromedia, Opera, and Sun Microsystems, announced a series of changes to web browser plugins. The new API will allow web developers to offer richer web browsing experiences, helping to maintain innovation and standards. The new plugin technologies are expected to be implemented in the future versions of the Mozilla applications.
Mozilla Firefox 1.5 and later versions include the Java Embedding plugin,[5] which allow Mac OS X users to run Java applets with the latest 1.4 and 5.0 versions of Java (the default Java software shipped by Apple is not compatible with any browser, except its own Safari).
[edit] Customizability
Beyond the use of Add-ons, Firefox additional customization features.
- The position of the toolbars and interface are customizable
- Hidden preferences in about:config which can be used to modify the behaviour of features and tweak performance.
- User stylesheets to change the style of webpages and Firefox's UI.
[edit] Web technologies support
Firefox has extensive support for most basic Web standards including HTML, XML, XHTML, CSS, JavaScript, DOM, MathML, SVG, XSL and XPath.[6] Firefox's standards support and growing popularity have been credited as one reason Internet Explorer 7 was to be released with improved standards support.[7]
Since Web standards are often in contradiction with Internet Explorer's behavior, Firefox, like other browsers, has a quirks mode. This mode attempts to mimic Internet Explorer's quirks mode, but it isn't completely compatible.[8] Because of the differing rendering, PC World notes that a minority of pages do not work in Firefox.[2]
c|Net notes that Firefox does not support ActiveX controls by default, which can also cause webpages to be missing features or to not work at all in Firefox.[9] Mozilla made the decision to not support ActiveX due to potential security vulnerabilities, its proprietary nature and its lack of cross-platform compatibility.[10][11][12] There are methods of using ActiveX in Firefox such as via third party plugins but they do not work in all versions of Firefox or on all platforms.[13]
Beginning on December 8, 2006, Firefox trunk nightly builds pass the Acid2 CSS standards compliance test, so all future releases of Firefox 3 will pass the test.[14]
[edit] Cross-platform support
Mozilla Firefox runs on a wide variety of platforms. Releases available on the primary distribution site support the following operating systems:
- Various versions of Microsoft Windows, including 98, 98SE, Me, NT 4.0, 2000, XP, and Server 2003
- Mac OS X
- Linux-based operating systems using X.Org Server or XFree86
Mozilla Firefox installation on Windows 95 requires a few additional steps.
Since the source code is available, it can also be compiled and run on a variety of other architectures and operating systems. Thus, Firefox is also available for many other systems. This includes Solaris (x86 and SPARC), OS/2, AIX, and FreeBSD. Builds for Windows XP Professional x64 Edition are also available. Mozilla Firefox is also the browser of choice for a good number of smaller operating systems, such as SkyOS and YellowTAB ZETA.
Firefox uses the same profile format on the different platforms, so a profile may be used on multiple platforms, if all of the platforms can access the same profile; this includes, for example, profiles stored on an NTFS (via FUSE) or FAT32 partition accessible from both Windows and Linux, or on a USB flash drive. This is useful for users who dual-boot their machines. However, it may cause a few problems, especially with extensions.
[edit] Security
Firefox includes many features designed to improve security. Key features include a sandbox security model, same origin policy, external protocol whitelisting, a phishing detector (in Firefox 2.0), Clear Private Data, and master passwords.[citation needed]
Firefox is open source software, and thus, its source code is visible to everyone. This allows anyone to review the code for security vulnerabilities, whether their intentions are good or malicious.[15] It also allowed the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to give funding for the automated tool Coverity to be run against Firefox code.[16]
Additionally, Mozilla has a security bug bounty system - anyone who reports a valid critical security bug receives a $500 (US) cash reward for each report and a Mozilla T-shirt.[17]
[edit] Vulnerability statistics
As of November 2006, the security firm Secunia reports no security flaws not yet fixed for Mozilla Firefox, as opposed to 3 security flaws not yet fixed for Microsoft Internet Explorer. In addition, according to Secunia, Firefox's vulnerabilities tend to be less critical than Internet Explorer's. While Internet Explorer users who have installed Windows XP Service Pack 2 are only affected by those 3 vulnerabilities, users of older versions of Windows are potentially affected by the 19 vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer 6 as Service Pack 2 is only available for Windows XP.
On the whole, Firefox security vulnerabilities have been patched relatively quickly. Symantec's Internet Security Threat Report Vol. 10, based on data from the first half of 2006, reported that while Firefox had more vulnerabilities that Internet Explorer during that time period (47 vs. 38), Firefox's vulnerabilities were fixed on average one day after the exploit code was made available, as compared to nine days for Internet Explorer.
Some experts have speculated that as Firefox becomes more popular, more vulnerabilities will be found,[18] a claim that Mitchell Baker, president of the Mozilla Foundation, has denied.[12]
There is this idea that market share alone will make you have more vulnerabilities. It is not relational at all. |
[edit] Expert and media coverage
The United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) stated that Internet Explorer's design makes it very difficult to secure. In contrast, almost none of their concerns apply to Firefox.[19]
There are a number of significant vulnerabilities in technologies relating to the IE domain/zone security model, local file system (Local Machine Zone) trust, the Dynamic HTML (DHTML) document object model (in particular, proprietary DHTML features), the HTML Help system, MIME type determination, the graphical user interface (GUI), and ActiveX... IE is integrated into Windows to such an extent that vulnerabilities in IE frequently provide an attacker significant access to the operating system. |
Some security experts, including Bruce Schneier[20] and David A. Wheeler[21], recommended that users should stop using Internet Explorer for normal browsing, and switch to a different browser instead; Wheeler specifically recommended Firefox.
Several technology columnists have suggested the same, including Wall Street Journal columnist Walter S. Mossberg,[22] Washington Post columnist Rob Pegoraro,[23] USA Today’s Byron Acohido and Jon Swartz,[24] Forbes's Arik Hesseldahl,[25] eWEEK.com Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols,[26] and Desktop Pipeline’s Scot Finnie.[27]
[edit] Usability
Firefox was designed for the average user, hiding advanced configuration and making features that do not require user interaction to function.[28] Jim Repoza of eWEEK states [29]
eWEEK Labs found Firefox 2.0, which can be downloaded at www.mozilla.com, to have the greatest out-of-the-box usability of any Web browser that we have tested (and that's a lot of Web browsers). |
Firefox also won UK Usability Professionals' Association's 2005 award for "Best software application".[30]
[edit] Other features
Firefox also has an incremental find feature known as "find as you type", invoked by the slash (/) key. With this feature enabled, a user can simply begin typing a word while viewing a web page, and Firefox automatically searches for it and highlights the first instance found. As the user types more of the word, Firefox refines its search. Also, if the user's exact query does not appear anywhere on the page, the "Find" box turns red. This feature does not yet extend to the text edit boxes.
There is also a built-in Mycroft Web search function with extensible search engine listing; by default, Firefox includes plugins for Google and Yahoo!, and also includes plugins for looking up a word on dictionary.com and browsing through Amazon.com listings. Other popular Mycroft search engines include Wikipedia, eBay, and IMDb. Mycroft is named after Mycroft Holmes, the fictional older and smarter brother of Sherlock Holmes. The Macintosh OS's built-in search system is named after Sherlock Holmes.
It should be noted that most of the aforementioned features are not unique to Firefox.
[edit] References
- ^ Reasons to switch to the Mozilla Firefox browser [1]
- ^ a b First Look at Mozilla.org's Firefox. PC World. Retrieved on 2006-09-22.
- ^ Malicious toolbars and extensions try to hijack browsers. ars technica. Retrieved on 2006-09-22.
- ^ Register Article on Greasemonkey Possible Malicious Attack[2]
- ^ Mozilla to include Java Embedding plugin. mozillaZine.
- ^ Web Browser Standard Support[3]
- ^ Paul Festa. Microsoft yielding to IE standards pressure?. cNet. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Mozilla's Bugzilla list of quirks mode bugs [4]
- ^ c|Net Reviews - Mozilla Firefox [5]
- ^ Mozilla.org Security Announcement [6]
- ^ Netscape Gecko Plugin Overview[7]
- ^ a b Michael Kanellos. Popularity won't make Firefox insecure, says Mozilla head. silicon.com. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Plug-in For Hosting ActiveX Controls [8]
- ^ David Baron. Mozilla doesn't pass the acid2 (acid 2) test. Retrieved on 2006-12-08.
- ^ Chad Perrin. Security through visibility: The secrets of open source security. TechRepublic. Retrieved on 2006-10-17.
- ^ Joris Evers. Homeland Security helps secure open-source code. cNet. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Mozilla Security Bug Bounty Program. Mozilla. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Bob Francis. Security firms fight Firefox fire with fire. InfoWorld.
- ^ Vulnerability Note VU#713878. US-CERT. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Bruce Schneider. Safe Personal Computing. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ David A. Wheeler. Securing Microsoft Windows (for Home and Small Business Users). Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Walter S. Mossberg. How to Protect Yourself From Vandals, Viruses If You Use Windows. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Rob Pegoraro. Firefox Leaves No Reason to Endure Internet Explorer. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Byron Acohido and Jon Swartz. Signs your PC's under siege, and what you can do. USA Today. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Arik Hesseldahl. Better Browser Now The Best. Forbes. Retrieved on 2006-10-26.
- ^ Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols. Internet Explorer Is Too Dangerous to Keep Using. eWEEK.com. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Scot Finnie. Firefox 1.0: The New World Wide Web Champ?. InformationWeek. Retrieved on 2006-10-13.
- ^ Asa Dotzler. opera and firefox. Retrieved on 2006-10-27.
- ^ Jim Repoza. Firefox 2.0 Balances Innovation with Ease of Use. eWEEK. Retrieved on 2006-10-27.
- ^ Ann Light. First UK UPA Awards commend Firefox, Flickr, Google, Apple, John Lewis and BA. UsabilityNews.com. Retrieved on 2006-10-27.