Faretta v. California
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Anthony Faretta v. State of California | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||||||||
Argued November 19, 1974 Decided June 30, 1975 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
A criminal defendant in a state proceeding has a constitutional right to knowingly refuse the aid of an attorney. Judgment vacated. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger Associate Justices: William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr., William Rehnquist |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Stewart Joined by: Douglas, Brennan, White, Marshall, and Powell Dissent by: Burger Joined by: Blackman, Rehnquist Dissent by: Blackman Joined by: Burger, Rehnquist |
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel in state criminal proceedings.
The defendant Anthony Faretta was accused of grand theft in Los Angeles County, California. Well before trial the defendant requested permission to represent himself at trial. After an admonition, the court granted his request, but later reversed the ruling and required a public defender to conduct the trial on the defendant's behalf. The jury found the defendant guilty, and the judgment was affirmed by the intermediate appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review.
In an opinion by Stewart, the court held that a defendant in a state criminal trial has the constitutional right to refuse appointed counsel and conduct the trial when he or she volutarily and intelligently elects to do so.
[edit] References
- ^ 422 U.S. 806 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.