Talk:Fagin the Jew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale.
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by the Comics WikiProject because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove auto=yes from the {{Comicsproj}} template above.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class= parameter in the {{Comicsproj}} template above and removing the stub template from the article.

I added a wikilink to 2003 for the book publishing, because I felt it was useful. 205.210.232.62 (talk contribs) removed it, because he did not feel it was useful. Anyone else has an opinion? I like it, but would not want to get into an edit war with that user. Thanks MosheZadka 12:07, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

It is my view that links to years that are not part of full dates are almost never useful, and I routinely remove them. At Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Date formatting it says:

"If the date doesn't contain a day and a month, then date preferences won't work, and square brackets won't respond to your readers' auto-formatting preferences. So unless there is a special relevance of the date link, there's no need to link it. This is an important point: simple years, decades and centuries should only be linked if there's a strong reason for doing so. See Wikipedia:Make_only_links_relevant_to_the_context for the reasons that it's usually undesirable to insert low-value chronological links; see also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Internal links."

I agree with this position. That is why I removed the link. (By the way 205.210.232.62 is an IP address that I often wind up with when i am logged out by mistake.) If others here strongly feeel that the year link should remain, so be it. I also don't want to get into an edit war. DES (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)