User talk:Fabricationary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Welcome to my talk page. Please leave a message at the bottom of the page and sign your name at the end of your message with four tildes like this: ~~~~. I will respond on your talk page, if applicable. Thanks :). Fabricationary 22:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Archives

[edit] Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

 Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 01:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Who are you

What are you going to do?? Terminate my account...this site is mint man....everything you do you get yelled at for...

[edit] Pazal

Hi Fabricationary. As the creator of the page for the micronation Pazal, I was wondering why you chose to delete it? Although I don't expect the page to be restored, I'd like to discuss this with you. Pazal is a micronation, it has no international recognition - however, it has strong recognition in the micronational world. We have nearly 150 citizens and write ups in The Guardian, the Telegraph, The New York Times and various newspapers local to my own territorial region. We have also featured on national radio. As micronations go, we're quite highly placed, and we have a strongly legitimate foundation. The truth is that we're not internet based, but neither are a number of things. The two things that really cut me were the comments (from others) "delusions of grandeur" (as most of this had nothing to do with me anyway!) and the remarks on the site (The website also cost money to host and I can assure you there aren't any adverts :) !) As you're a student of Chinese history and politics, I'd have imagined you'd have come accross Pazal at least briefly. Again, thanks for reading and I look forward to discussing this further with you. All the best, Johnny. Jamescbernthal 20:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Jamescbernthal

[edit] re Future events

See also the Playstation 3 entries for November 11 and November 17. Jim Douglas 02:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Do we have some guidelines about what kind of entries we can yank from those pages? The problem cases are no-name actors or singers or (gak) wrestlers. I'm tempted to pull more of the cruft, but it's hard to argue the point when the no-name in question has a Wikipedia entry. -- Jim Douglas 02:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Well, just as a fr'instance, the Kenny Kim article was created last week and immediately added to September 20. I yanked it from the day page, and it was added back. I added my concerns about the article on Talk:Kenny Kim and User talk:Dude77; so far, no response. I'm pondering nominating the article for deletion if there's no response in a few days. Am I completely off-base? -- Jim Douglas 03:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
FYI -- Jim Douglas 17:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I have no idea what is going on

Hi,

Today when I checked smth. on Wiki I found I have a message. It came from you apparently.

"Your recent edit to Hillary Rodham Clinton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 06:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hillary Rodham Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 06:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)"''

Well, I never ever neither visited that page before nor changed or edited sth. there. I received other messages too, that from my IP adress sb. made useless changes in articled. Well, it is not me and I have no idea how comes! Best regards ShiLei

[edit] Congrats!

You have recently been added to my Respect List. Clay4president 21:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help needed in conflict with other editor, if possible

If not help, then at least advice.

I'm currently involved in discussing the Homophobia article on the article's Talk page - the article itself has been locked after an edit war, and the topic has gone to Mediation, but I'm really unclear about what the mediator can do, if anything - she doesn't seem to have done anything up to now.

The Talk:Homophobia page has gone slightly mad, and I'm currently conflicted with one other editor in particular, R-b-j.

R-b-j asserts I called him a homophobe: at this point I'd be willing to apologise for that, if it would mean he'd just stick to the point at hand and leave out the long personal anecdotes about how he worked on the Dean campaign! (I am, at this point, unclear if I did call him a homophobe, or if he decided I was calling him a homophobe based on something else I wrote, but he claims not to be attacking me because of that, and indeed he claims not to be attacking me at all...)

My previous experience of personal attacks was quite clear cut: an anonymous editor was abusing me, I reported them to an admin, eventually anon was banned. This is less clear-cut: R-b-j claims to be only attacking my "arguing style", and not me, but in practice I find it hard to tell the difference, and certainly, R-b-j's personalising the debate really isn't helping cool it down. R-b-j is one of the parties named in the Mediation: I presume therefore we have to get agreement: but I can't see specifically how R-b-j and I will ever manage to agree. Nor do I really want to see R-b-j banned: I just want him/her/it to quit with the personal attacks (whether on me or on my arguing style) and just discuss the topic to hand.

I've repeatedly requested this: R-b-j appears to take offense. There's now a whole section labelled who is playing the games? that really adds nothing to the debate at hand: it's all about how wrong I am.

Sorry for this lengthy comment: I will be very grateful for any advice/help you can provide.

Yonmei 19:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/a/b/User_talk%7EFabricationary_918f.html"